首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education >Direct and Indirect Effects of Restrictive US Immigration Policies on Pharmacy Education
【2h】

Direct and Indirect Effects of Restrictive US Immigration Policies on Pharmacy Education

机译:限制美国移民政策对药房教育的直接和间接影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Immigration policy and enforcement in the United States has experienced many ebbs and flows over our 244-year history as an independent nation, with policies either supporting or opposing the influx of new citizens at different stages of development.1 No political party can claim the proverbial “high ground” when immigration policy is viewed through a greater historical lens, but the Trump Administration campaigned on a hardline anti-immigrant platform and effectively executed several actions to restrict immigration into the United States throughout his term in office.2 The nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute (MPI) cataloged more than 400 executive actions under the Trump Administration that effectively reshaped the US immigration system, including actions on border protection, asylum case administration, immigration courts, and visa processes.3 While immigration policy changes in the United States have broad implications on the economy, culture, and everyday life of millions of people, leaders in pharmacy education may not always connect these larger policy actions to the specific needs of our more focused pharmacy education stakeholders (students, faculty, staff, etc). However, when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced in July 2020 that students who were enrolled in schools that were shifting to online-only education because of the coronavirus identified in 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic would not be eligible to retain their student visas and could be subject to deportation procedures unless they were attending at least one in-person class, immigration policy became a major priority for higher education leaders.4 While this rule was revoked shortly after, this action and the preceding pattern of immigration restriction raises concerns for those who are involved in pharmacy education and brings about the question of how future immigration policies could impact pharmacy schools. In this commentary, we provide an overview of potential direct and indirect effects of more restrictive immigration policies on the system of pharmacy education within and outside the United States.
机译:美国的移民政策和执法人员经历了许多EBB和流动,以至于我们的244年历史作为一个独立的国家,有政策要么在发展的不同阶段支持或反对新公民的涌入.1没有政党可以申请众所周知“高地”当移民政策通过更大的历史镜头来看待时,但特朗普政府在一个硬质线反移民平台上竞选并有效地执行了几个行动,以在办公室在办公室中限制在美国的移民到美国。“非巴利人移民政策研究所(MPI)在特朗普政府下编制了400多个行政行动,有效地重塑了美国移民制度,包括边境保护,庇护案例管理,移民法院和签证进程的行动.3,美国的移民政策变化广泛对经济,文化和数百万人的日常生活的影响PLE,药学教育的领导人可能并不总是将这些更大的政策行为联系起来,以对我们更加集中的药房教育利益相关者(学生,教师,员工等)的具体需求。但是,当移民和海关执法(ICE)于2020年7月宣布时,由于2019年(Covid-19)大流行的冠状病毒(Covid-19)大流行而在唯一的学校入学的学生将没有资格保留他们的学生签证,可能会受到驱逐程序,除非他们至少参加一个独立的课程,移民政策成为高等教育领导人的重大优先事项.4当此规则不久之后,这一规则被撤销,此行动和移民限制前方模式提出对参与药房教育的人的担忧,并带来了未来移民政策如何影响药学学校的问题。在这方面,我们概述了美国内外和境外药房教育系统更具限制性移民政策的潜在直接和间接影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号