• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Caring Sciences >The Effect of Two Educational Methods on Knowledge and Adherence to Treatmentin Hemodialysis Patients: Clinical Trial
【2h】

The Effect of Two Educational Methods on Knowledge and Adherence to Treatmentin Hemodialysis Patients: Clinical Trial

机译：两种教育方法对知识和坚持治疗的影响在血液透析患者中​​：临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

>Introduction:Patients with chronic renal disease (CRD) deal with many potential problems with hemodialysis for all their life. Regarding the importance of preventing dialysis adverse effects, which are in close connection with lack of knowledge and report on how to train the patients? This study aims at comparing the impact of two methods of face to face training and training pamphlet on complying and informing of hemodialysis treatments. >Methods: This clinical trial study was conducted on 58 hemodialysis patients who visited Shahid Rahnemun Teaching hospital, Yazd, Iran, and had required conditions of the research. Data were collected through a questionnaire including personal-social information, several questions to assess the level of compliance and to inform the treatment method. The quantitative analysis of this study used the Statistical Package for Social Sciences SPSS version 13 and descriptive (frequency, mean, standard deviation) and inferential (Chi-square, paired t-test, ANOVA, ANCOVA) statistics were employed. >Results: The mean scores for informing both groups (face to face and training pamphlet) were significantly increased. The mean score for adherence to treatments was also significant.>Conclusion: In this research, face to face training was found to be more effective than training pamphlet. It seemed to have morestrong effect on increasing the level of information and adherence to treatment. To trainthese people, face to face training should be, thus, preferred.
机译：>简介：患有慢性肾脏病（CRD）的患者一生都在处理血液透析的许多潜在问题。关于预防透析不良反应的重要性，这与缺乏知识并报告如何培训患者密切相关？这项研究旨在比较两种面对面培训和培训手册对遵守和告知血液透析治疗方法的影响。 >方法：该临床试验研究是对58位血液透析患者进行的，这些患者访问了伊朗亚兹德的Shahid Rahnemun教学医院，并具有必要的研究条件。通过问卷调查收集数据，包括个人社交信息，几个问题以评估依从性水平并告知治疗方法。这项研究的定量分析使用了《社会科学统计软件包》 SPSS 13版，并采用了描述性（频率，均值，标准差）和推论性（卡方检验，配对t检验，方差分析，ANCOVA）。 >结果：通知两组（面对面和训练手册）的平均得分均显着提高。坚持治疗的平均分数也很重要。>结论：在这项研究中，发现面对面训练比训练手册更有效。似乎还有更多对提高信息水平和坚持治疗具有强大作用。训练因此，这些人应该是当面培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号