• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Focusing Resource Allocation-Wellbeing as a Tool for Prioritizing Interventions for Communities at Risk
【2h】

Focusing Resource Allocation-Wellbeing as a Tool for Prioritizing Interventions for Communities at Risk

机译：关注资源分配-福利作为优先考虑处于危险中的社区的干预措施的工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective: This study examined whether a wellbeing approach to resilience and adaptation would provide practical insights for prioritizing support to communities experiencing environmental and socio-economic stressors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey, based on a purposive sample of 2,196 stakeholders (landholders, hobby farmers, town resident and change agents) from three irrigation-dependent communities in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin. Respondents’ adaptive capacity and wellbeing (individual and collective adaptive capacity, subjective wellbeing, social support, community connectivity, community leadership, in the context of known life stressors) were examined using chi-square, comparison of mean scores, hierarchical regression and factor-cluster analysis. Results: Statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) were observed between individual (0.331) and collective (0.318) adaptive capacity and wellbeing. Taking into account respondents’ self-assessed health and socio-economic circumstances, perceptions of individual (15%) and collective adaptive capacity (10%) as well as community connectivity (13%) were associated with wellbeing (R2 = 0.36; F (9, 2099) = 132.9; p < 0.001). Cluster analysis found that 11% of respondents were particularly vulnerable, reporting below average scores on all indicators, with 56% of these reporting below threshold scores on subjective wellbeing. Conclusions: Addressing the capacity of individuals to work with others and to adapt to change, serve as important strategies in maintaining wellbeing in communities under stress. The human impacts of exogenous stressors appear to manifest themselves in poorer health outcomes; addressing primary stressors may in turn aid wellbeing. Longitudinal studies are indicated to verify these findings. Wellbeing may serve as a useful and parsimonious proxy measure for resilience and adaptive capacity.
机译：目的：本研究研究了一种抗灾能力和适应能力的福利方法是否能为优先支持遭受环境和社会经济压力的社区提供实用见解。方法：一项横断面调查，该调查基于澳大利亚墨累达令盆地三个依赖灌溉的社区的2,196个利益相关者（土地所有者，业余农民，城镇居民和变更代理人）的有针对性的样本。调查对象的适应能力和幸福感（个人和集体适应能力，主观幸福感，社会支持，社区联系，社区领导，在已知生活压力源的背景下）采用卡方检验，均值比较，等级回归和因子聚类分析。结果：个体（0.331）和集体（0.318）的适应能力和幸福感之间存在统计学上的显着相关性（p <0.05）。考虑到受访者的自我评估的健康和社会经济状况，对个人的看法（15％）和集体适应能力（10％）以及社区连通性（13％）与幸福感相关（R 2 < /sup>＝0.36；F(9，2099)＝132.9；p＜0.001）。聚类分析发现，11％的受访者特别脆弱，报告的所有指标均低于平均得分，其中56％的受访者的主观幸福感低于阈值。结论：提高个人与他人合作和适应变化的能力，是在压力下维持社区福祉的重要策略。外源性应激源对人类的影响似乎表现为较差的健康结果。解决主要压力因素可能反过来有助于改善健康。纵向研究表明，以验证这些发现。福利可以作为抵御力和适应能力的一种有用且简单的替代指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号