首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games
【2h】

Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games

机译:2016年里约奥运会(RIO Olympics)羽毛球布景分析中的统计差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present study was to determine statistical differences in a set of badminton competition matches in five different modalities with regard to competition level (Group Phase vs. Eliminatory Phase). Data from 453 sets (125 in men’s singles; 108 sets in women’s singles; 77 sets in men’s doubles; 73 in women’s doubles and 70 in mixed doubles) from the RIO 2016 Olympics Games were recorded and classified in two groups of variables to analyze variables related to match (5) and set (15). A descriptive analysis and univariate test (Mann–Whitney U) for non-parametric data were conducted. The results show in men’s and women’s singles all the variables related to match were higher in the Elimination Phase than in the Group Phase (p < 0.01). In Sets 1 and 3, the longest set duration, rally and average rally were found in the Elimination Phase than Group Stage (p < 0.05). In women’s singles, these differences were also recorded in Set 2. For doubles, the results are more stable among groups. Men’s doubles had a longer duration of the match and set (sets 1 and set 2) (p < 0.01), and also scored highest for average rally strokes (sets 1 3) (p < 0.05) and shuttles used in the Elimination Phase vs. the Group Phase along the match (p < 0.01). In women’s doubles, more shuttles were used in a match in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. Moreover, the same results are established for Set 2, including for average rally. Mixed doubles saw no match going to three sets. However, the greatest differences showed a longer rally and average rally being registered in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. In conclusion, the timing factors of the badminton singles and doubles games were different in the Elimination and Group Phases. This information may help players and coaches prepare and administer different types of workouts or, more specifically, competition schedules adapted to the characteristics of modern badminton.
机译:本研究的目的是确定一组羽毛球比赛中在比赛水平(小组阶段与淘汰阶段)的五种不同模式下的统计差异。记录了2016年里约奥运会(RIO)的453套数据(男子单打125套;女子单打108套;男子双打77套;女子双打73套;混合双打70套),并将数据分为两组变量进行分析与匹配项(5)和集合(15)相关。对非参数数据进行了描述性分析和单变量检验(Mann-Whitney U)。结果显示,在男子单打和女子单打中,淘汰赛阶段所有与比赛相关的变量都比小组赛阶段高(p <0.01)。在第1组和第3组中,淘汰阶段的最长持续时间,集会和平均集会比小组赛阶段更长(p <0.05)。在女子单打中,这些差异也记录在第二组中。对于双打,组之间的结果更为稳定。男子双打比赛的比赛时间和比赛时间更长(第1组和第2组)(p <0.01),并且在平均淘汰赛中(第1 3组)(p <0.05)和淘汰阶段vs比赛中的小组阶段(p <0.01)。在女子双打比赛中,淘汰赛中比赛使用的接驳车次数多于小组赛阶段。此外,对于第2组也建立了相同的结果,包括平均反弹。混合双打没有比赛进入三盘。但是,最大的差异是淘汰赛中的反弹和平均反弹比团体阶段的更长。总之,羽毛球单打和双打比赛的计时因素在淘汰阶段和小组阶段是不同的。该信息可以帮助球员和教练准备和管理不同类型的锻炼,或更具体地说,是适应于现代羽毛球特点的比赛时间表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号