首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >When Ingroups Aren’t “In”: Perceived Political Belief Similarity Moderates Religious Ingroup Favoritism
【2h】

When Ingroups Aren’t “In”: Perceived Political Belief Similarity Moderates Religious Ingroup Favoritism

机译:当团体不“进入”时:感知到的政治信仰相似性会减轻宗教团体的偏爱

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Motivated thinking leads people to perceive similarity between the self and ingroups, but under some conditions, people may recognize that personal beliefs are misaligned with the beliefs of ingroups. In two focal experiments and two replications, we find evidence that perceived belief similarity moderates ingroup favoritism. As part of a charity donation task, participants donated money to a community charity or a religious charity. Compared to non-religious people, Christians favored religious charities, but within Christians, conservative Christians favored religious charities more than liberal Christians did. demonstrated that the perceived political beliefs of the charity accounted for the differences in ingroup favoritism between liberal and conservative Christians. While reporting little awareness of the influence of ideology, Christian conservatives favored religious charities because they perceived them as conservative and liberal Christians favored the community charity because they perceived it as liberal.
机译:积极的思维使人们感知到自我和群体之间的相似性,但是在某些情况下,人们可能会认识到个人信仰与群体信仰不一致。在两次重点实验和两次重复实验中,我们发现证据表明,感知到的信念相似性会缓解群体偏爱。作为慈善捐赠任务的一部分,参与者将钱捐赠给社区慈善机构或宗教慈善机构。与非宗教人士相比,基督徒更偏爱宗教慈善事业,但在基督徒内部,保守派基督徒比自由信徒更偏爱宗教慈善事业。证明了慈善组织所感知的政治信仰是自由派和保守派基督徒在群体偏爱中的差异所在。基督教保守派虽然对意识形态的影响知之甚少,但他们偏爱宗教慈善机构,因为他们认为他们是保守派,而自由派基督徒则偏爱社区慈善机构,因为他们认为它是自由派。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号