首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Simple, Fast and Accurate Implementation of the Diffusion Approximation Algorithm for Stochastic Ion Channels with Multiple States
【2h】

Simple, Fast and Accurate Implementation of the Diffusion Approximation Algorithm for Stochastic Ion Channels with Multiple States

机译:具有多个状态的随机离子通道的扩散近似算法的简单,快速和准确实现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe phenomena that emerge from the interaction of the stochastic opening and closing of ion channels (channel noise) with the non-linear neural dynamics are essential to our understanding of the operation of the nervous system. The effects that channel noise can have on neural dynamics are generally studied using numerical simulations of stochastic models. Algorithms based on discrete Markov Chains (MC) seem to be the most reliable and trustworthy, but even optimized algorithms come with a non-negligible computational cost. Diffusion Approximation (DA) methods use Stochastic Differential Equations (SDE) to approximate the behavior of a number of MCs, considerably speeding up simulation times. However, model comparisons have suggested that DA methods did not lead to the same results as in MC modeling in terms of channel noise statistics and effects on excitability. Recently, it was shown that the difference arose because MCs were modeled with coupled gating particles, while the DA was modeled using uncoupled gating particles. Implementations of DA with coupled particles, in the context of a specific kinetic scheme, yielded similar results to MC. However, it remained unclear how to generalize these implementations to different kinetic schemes, or whether they were faster than MC algorithms. Additionally, a steady state approximation was used for the stochastic terms, which, as we show here, can introduce significant inaccuracies.
机译:背景技术离子通道的随机打开和关闭(通道噪声)与非线性神经动力学的相互作用产生的现象对于我们理解神经系统的运行至关重要。通常使用随机模型的数值模拟来研究通道噪声对神经动力学的影响。基于离散马尔可夫链(MC)的算法似乎是最可靠和值得信赖的,但是即使是优化算法也具有不可忽略的计算成本。扩散近似(DA)方法使用随机微分方程(SDE)来近似许多MC的行为,从而大大加快了仿真速度。然而,模型比较表明,就信道噪声统计和对兴奋性的影响而言,DA方法无法获得与MC建模相同的结果。最近,发现差异的出现是因为MC是用耦合门控粒子建模的,而DA是用非耦合门控粒子建模的。在特定动力学方案的背景下,用偶联颗粒实现DA的结果与MC相似。但是,仍然不清楚如何将这些实现概括为不同的动力学方案,或者它们是否比MC算法更快。另外,对于随机项,使用稳态近似,如我们在此处所示,可能会引入明显的误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号