首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Comparison of dry and wet deposition of particulate matter in near-surface waters during summer
【2h】

Comparison of dry and wet deposition of particulate matter in near-surface waters during summer

机译:夏季近地表水中颗粒物干湿沉降的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Atmospheric particulate matter (PM) deposition which involves both dry and wet processes is an important means of controlling air pollution. To investigate the characteristics of dry and wet deposition in wetlands, PM concentrations and meteorological conditions were monitored during summer at heights of 1.5 m, 6 m and 10 m above ground level at Cuihu Wetland (Beijing, China) in order to assess the efficiency of PM2.5 (particles with an aerodynamic size of <2.5 μm) and PM10 (particles with an aerodynamic size of <10 μm) removal. The results showed: Daily concentrations of PM, dry deposition velocities and fluxes changed with the same variation trend. The daily average deposition velocity for PM10 (3.19 ± 1.18 cm·s–1) was almost 10 times that of PM2.5 (0.32 ± 0.33 cm·s–1). For PM2.5, the following dry deposition fluxes were recorded: 10 m (0.170 ± 0.463 μg·m–2·s–1) > 6 m (0.007 ± 0.003 μg·m–2·s–1) > 1.5 m (0.005 ± 0.002 μg·m–2·s–1). And the following deposition fluxes for PM10 were recorded: 10 m (2.163 ± 2.941 μg·m–2·s–1) > 1.5 m (1.565 ± 0.872 μg·m–2·s–1) > 6 m (0.987 ± 0.595 μg·m–2·s–1). In the case of wet deposition, the relative deposition fluxes for PM2.5 and PM10 were 1.5 m > 10 m > 6 m, i.e. there was very little difference between the fluxes for PM2.5 (0.688 ± 0.069 μg·m–2·s–1) and for PM10 (0.904 ± 0.103 μg·m–2·s–1). It was also noted that rainfall intensity and PM diameter influenced wet deposition efficiency. Dry deposition (63%) was more tilted towards removing PM10 than was the case for wet deposition (37%). In terms of PM2.5 removal, wet deposition (92%) was found to be more efficient.
机译:涉及干法和湿法工艺的大气颗粒物(PM)沉积是控制空气污染的重要手段。为了调查湿地的干湿沉降特征,夏季在翠湖湿地(中国北京)高出地面1.5 m,6 m和10 m的高度对PM浓度和气象条件进行了监测,以评估湿地的效率。去除PM2.5(空气动力学尺寸<2.5μm的颗粒)和PM10(空气动力学尺寸<10μm的颗粒)。结果表明:每日PM浓度,干沉降速度和通量以相同的变化趋势变化。 PM10的日平均沉积速度(3.19±1.18 cm·s –1 )几乎是PM2.5(0.32±0.33 cm·s –1 )的10倍。对于PM2.5,记录了以下干沉降通量:10 m(0.170±0.463μg·m –2 ·s –1 )> 6 m(0.007±0.003) μg·m –2 ·s –1 )> 1.5 m(0.005±0.002μg·m –2 ·s –1 )。并记录了以下PM10的沉积通量:10 m(2.163±2.941μg·m –2 ·s –1 )> 1.5 m(1.565±0.872μg·m –2 ·s –1 )> 6 m(0.987±0.595μg·m –2 ·s –1 )。在湿法沉积的情况下,PM2.5和PM10的相对沉积通量为1.5 m> 10 m> 6 m,即PM2.5的通量之间差异很小(0.688±0.069μg·m –2 ·s –1 )和PM10(0.904±0.103μg·m –2 ·s –1 )。还注意到降雨强度和PM直径影响湿沉降效率。与湿法沉积(37%)相比,干法沉积(63%)更倾向于去除PM10。在去除PM2.5方面,发现湿法沉积(92%)更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号