• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Activism in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Struggles against Dual Hegemony and the Emergence of Local First
【2h】

Activism in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Struggles against Dual Hegemony and the Emergence of Local First

机译：波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的激进主义：反对双重霸权和地方优先的出现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The 2014 protests and plenums in Bosnia-Herzegovina were widely noted for their insertion of economic and social justice topics into the stale public discourse of ethnocracy. They also signified a potential to break with an anemic civil society shaped by international intervention, technocratic “project logic” and apolitical service provision. This article argues for treating these struggles in reference to the dual nature of the hegemony created by both local ethnonationalists and international liberal intervenors. It applies a Gramscian perspective to the processes by which hegemony is created and (re)produced via consensus in civil society. The challenge to dual hegemony can be seen in the central focus of contestation on social justice in economic arrangements as well as in the alternative logics of engagement and organizational forms in society. We describe the tensions arising from this dual challenge in terms of the degree to which they contest or reproduce the predominant anti-politics, a stance of distancing from dialogue or even contact with political actors and institutions. We conclude that the events during and since 2014 have strengthened the means to build an alternative third bloc via a “local first” approach, containing heterogeneous forms of local-scale action with explicitly political strategies.
机译：2014年在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的抗议活动和全民公会因将经济和社会正义主题插入到过时的民族主义公共言论中而受到广泛关注。它们还表明有可能打破由国际干预，技术官僚的“项目逻辑”和非政治性服务提供形成的消极的民间社会。本文主张参照当地民族民族主义者和国际自由主义者介入的霸权的双重性质来对待这些斗争。它在公民社会通过共识建立和（再）再现霸权的过程中运用了葛兰西的观点。对双重霸权的挑战可以从经济安排中对社会正义的争夺焦点以及社会中参与和组织形式的替代逻辑中看出。我们从这种双重挑战所产生的紧张关系方面来描述，它们在多大程度上反抗或再现了主要的反政治思想，远离对话甚至与政治角色和机构接触的立场。我们得出的结论是，自2014年以来以及自2014年以来发生的事件增强了通过“本地优先”方法建立替代性第三集团的手段，其中包含异类形式的地方规模行动以及明确的政治战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号