• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Impartiality statistical tit-for-tats and the construction of balance: UK television news reporting of the 2016 EU referendum campaign
【2h】

Impartiality statistical tit-for-tats and the construction of balance: UK television news reporting of the 2016 EU referendum campaign

机译：公正统计针锋相对和平衡的构建：2016年英国公投活动的英国电视新闻报道

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There has been greater news industry recognition in recent years that impartiality should not be translated into simply balancing the competing sides of a debate or issue. The binary nature of a referendum campaign represents a unique moment to consider whether broadcasters have put this into practice beyond routine political reporting. This study examines how impartiality was editorially interpreted in television news coverage during the United Kingdom’s 2016 European Union referendum. We carried out a systematic content analysis of the United Kingdom’s main evening bulletins over the 10-week campaign, examining the issues and sources shaping coverage, as well as all the statistical claims made by campaign actors. Our aim was to critically examine how notions of impartiality were constructed and interpreted, exploring any operational limits and political consequences. Overall, we found that news bulletins maintained a fairly strict adherence to a central binary balance between issues and actors during the campaign. But this binary was politically inflected, with a significant imbalance in party political perspectives, presenting us with a right-wing rather than a left-wing case for European Union membership. We also found that independent expert analysis and testimony was sucked into the partisan binary between leave and remain campaigners, while journalists were reluctant to challenge or contextualise claims and counter-claims. Journalists were, in this sense, constrained by the operational definition of impartiality adopted by broadcasters. We argue for a more evidence-driven approach to impartiality, where journalists independently explore the veracity of campaign claims and have the editorial freedom to challenge them. We also suggest that the reliance on claims and counter-claims by leading Conservative politicians did little to advance public understanding of the European Union, and helped perpetuate a series of long-standing negative associations the British media have been reporting for many decades.
机译：近年来，新闻界越来越认识到，公正不应该转化为简单地平衡辩论或问题的竞争方面。全民公决运动的二进制性质代表了一个独特的时刻，可以考虑广播公司是否将其付诸实践，而不是常规的政治报道。这项研究研究了英国在2016年欧盟公投期间电视新闻报道中如​​何公正地解释公正性。我们对为期10周的竞选活动在英国的主要晚间公告进行了系统的内容分析，研究了影响报道范围的问题和来源以及竞选活动者的所有统计主张。我们的目的是批判性研究公正性的概念是如何构建和解释的，探索任何操作上的限制和政治后果。总体而言，我们发现新闻公告在竞选期间始终严格遵守问题和参与者之间的中央二进制平衡。但是，这种二元性在政治上受到了影响，在党派政治观点上存在严重失衡，这使我们成为欧盟成员资格的右翼而非左翼案例。我们还发现，独立专家的分析和证词被纳入休假和继续竞选活动之间的党派二元性中，而新闻记者则不愿质疑主张或反主张。从这个意义上说，新闻工作者受到广播公司采用的公正性的业务定义的限制。我们主张采用一种更加循证的公正性方法，让记者独立探索竞选主张的真实性，并拥有编辑自由来挑战它们。我们还建议，保守党领袖保守政客对主张和反诉的依赖并不能促进公众对欧洲联盟的了解，并有助于使英国媒体几十年来一直报道的一系列长期的消极联系永存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号