• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Happy with Your Capabilities? Valuing ICECAP-O and ICECAP-A States Based on Experienced Utility Using Subjective Well-Being Data
【2h】

Happy with Your Capabilities? Valuing ICECAP-O and ICECAP-A States Based on Experienced Utility Using Subjective Well-Being Data

机译：对您的能力满意吗？使用主观幸福感数据根据经验丰富的效用对ICECAP-O和ICECAP-A状态进行评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The ICECAP-O and the ICECAP-A are validated capability well-being instruments. To be used in economic evaluations, multidimensional instruments require weighting of the distinguished well-being states. These weights are usually obtained through ex ante preference elicitation (i.e., decision utility) but could also be based on experienced utility. This article describes the development of value sets for ICECAP-O and ICECAP-A based on experienced utility and compares them with current decision utility weights. Data from 2 cross-sectional samples corresponding to the target groups of ICECAP-O and ICECAP-A were used in 2 separate analyses. The utility impacts of ICECAP-O and ICECAP-A levels were assessed through regression models using a composite measure of subjective well-being as a proxy for experienced utility. The observed utility impacts were rescaled to match the 0 to 1 range of the existing value set. The calculated experienced utility values were similar to the decision utility weights for some of the ICECAP dimensions but deviated for others. The largest differences were found for weights of the ICECAP-O dimension enjoyment and the ICECAP-A dimensions attachment and autonomy. The results suggest a different weighting of ICECAP-O and ICECAP-A levels if experienced utility is used instead of decision utility.
机译：ICECAP-O和ICECAP-A是经过验证的能力健康工具。为了用于经济评估，多维工具需要对杰出的幸福状态进行加权。这些权重通常通过事前偏好启发（即决策效用）获得，但是也可以基于经验效用。本文介绍了基于经验效用的ICECAP-O和ICECAP-A价值集的开发，并将它们与当前决策效用权重进行了比较。来自2个横截面样本的数据分别对应于ICECAP-O和ICECAP-A的目标组，分别用于2次分析。 ICECAP-O和ICECAP-A水平对效用的影响是通过回归模型评估的，该模型使用主观幸福感的综合度量作为有经验效用的替代指标。重新调整观察到的效用影响，以匹配现有值集的0到1范围。对于某些ICECAP维度，计算得出的经验效用值类似于决策效用权重，但对于其他维度却有所不同。发现最大的差异在于ICECAP-O维度享受的权重与ICECAP-A维度的依附性和自治性。结果表明，如果使用有经验的效用代替决策效用，则ICECAP-O和ICECAP-A的权重将有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号