• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives
【2h】

Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives

机译：科学与政策界线的边界：从业者的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Cultivating a more dynamic relationship between science and policy is essential for responding to complex social challenges such as sustainability. One approach to doing so is to “span the boundaries” between science and decision making and create a more comprehensive and inclusive knowledge exchange process. The exact definition and role of boundary spanning, however, can be nebulous. Indeed, boundary spanning often gets conflated and confused with other approaches to connecting science and policy, such as science communication, applied science, and advocacy, which can hinder progress in the field of boundary spanning. To help overcome this, in this perspective, we present the outcomes from a recent workshop of boundary-spanning practitioners gathered to (1) articulate a definition of what it means to work at this interface (“boundary spanning”) and the types of activities it encompasses; (2) present a value proposition of these efforts to build better relationships between science and policy; and (3) identify opportunities to more effectively mainstream boundary-spanning activities. Drawing on our collective experiences, we suggest that boundary spanning has the potential to increase the efficiency by which useful research is produced, foster the capacity to absorb new evidence and perspectives into sustainability decision-making, enhance research relevance for societal challenges, and open new policy windows. We provide examples from our work that illustrate this potential. By offering these propositions for the value of boundary spanning, we hope to encourage a more robust discussion of how to achieve evidence-informed decision-making for sustainability.
机译：培养科学与政策之间更动态的关系对于应对诸如可持续性之类的复杂社会挑战至关重要。一种这样做的方法是“跨越科学与决策之间的界限”，并创建一个更全面，更具包容性的知识交流过程。但是，边界跨越的确切定义和作用可能是模糊的。的确，边界跨越常常与其他将科学与政策联系起来的方法混淆和混淆，例如科学传播，应用科学和倡导，这可能会阻碍边界跨越领域的进步。为了帮助克服这一问题，我们从这个角度介绍了最近跨界实践者研讨会的成果，该研讨会聚集在以下方面：（1）明确定义在此界面工作的含义（“跨界跨越”）和活动类型它包含； （2）提出这些在科学与政策之间建立更好关系的努力的价值主张； （3）找出机会，以更有效地将跨境活动主流化。借鉴我们的集体经验，我们建议边界跨越可以提高产生有用研究的效率，增强将新证据和观点吸收到可持续发展决策中的能力，增强与社会挑战相关的研究意义，并开放新的领域。政策窗口。我们提供了一些工作实例来说明这种潜力。通过为边界扩展的价值提供这些建议，我们希望鼓励就如何实现以证据为依据的可持续性决策做出更积极的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号