• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Modeling normativity in sustainability: a comparison of the sustainable development goals the Paris agreement and the papal encyclical
【2h】

Modeling normativity in sustainability: a comparison of the sustainable development goals the Paris agreement and the papal encyclical

机译：在可持续性方面规范规范：对可持续发展目标巴黎协定和罗马教皇的百科全书进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The idea of sustainability is intrinsically normative. Thus, understanding the role of normativity in sustainability discourses is crucial for further developing sustainability science. In this article, we analyze three important documents that aim to advance sustainability and explore how they organize norms in relation to sustainability. The three documents are: the Pope’s Encyclical Laudato Si’, the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement. We show that understanding the role of different types of norms in the three documents can help understand normative features of both scientific and non-scientific sustainability discourses. We present the diverse system of norms in a model that interrelates three different levels: macro, meso, and micro. Our model highlights how several processes affect the normative orientation of nations and societies at the meso-level in different ways. For instance, individual ethical norms at the micro-level, such as personal responsibility, may help decelerate unsustainable consumerism at the aggregate meso-level. We also show that techno-scientific norms at the macro-level representing global indicators for sustainability may accelerate innovations. We suggest that our model can help better organize normative features of sustainability discourses and, therefore, to contribute to the further development of sustainability science.
机译：可持续性的想法本质上是规范性的。因此，了解规范在可持续发展话语中的作用对于进一步发展可持续性科学至关重要。在本文中，我们分析了旨在促进可持续性的三个重要文档，并探讨了它们如何组织与可持续性相关的规范。这三份文件分别是：教皇的《大百科全书》，《可持续发展目标》和《巴黎协定》。我们表明，了解这三份文件中不同类型规范的作用可以帮助理解科学和非科学的可持续发展话语的规范特征。我们在一个模型中提出了多样化的规范系统，该模型将三个不同的层次相互关联：宏观，中观和微观。我们的模型强调了几个过程如何以不同的方式影响中观国家和社会的规范取向。例如，微观层面的个人道德规范（例如个人责任）可能有助于降低总体中观层面上不可持续的消费主义。我们还表明，代表全球可持续性指标的宏观层面的技术科学规范可能会加速创新。我们建议我们的模型可以帮助更好地组织可持续性话语的规范特征，从而为可持续性科学的进一步发展做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号