首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Coalition Policy-Making under Constraints: Examining the Role of Preferences and Institutions
【2h】

Coalition Policy-Making under Constraints: Examining the Role of Preferences and Institutions

机译:约束条件下的联盟政策制定:研究偏好和制度的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While much has been written about the formation and termination of coalitions, comparatively little attention has been paid to the policy output of multiparty governments. The present study attempts to narrow this research gap by analysing policy-making in three Austrian coalition governments between 1999 and 2008. Drawing on the party mandate literature, a manually coded textual analysis of election manifestos is conducted that yields a dataset containing over 1,100 pledges. The fulfilment of these pledges is taken as the dependent variable in a multivariate analysis. The results indicate that institutional determinants (adoption in the coalition agreement, ministerial control, and policy status quo) significantly influence the chances of pledge fulfilment and thus present a powerful predictor of coalition policy output. By contrast, factors related to parties’ preferences (consensus between parties, policy distance, pledge saliency, and majority support in parliament) do not have an impact.
机译:尽管有关联盟的成立和终止的文章很多,但对多党政府的政策输出却很少关注。本研究试图通过分析三个奥地利联盟政府在1999年至2008年之间的决策来缩小研究差距。利用党的授权文献,对选举宣言进行手动编码的文本分析,得出的数据集包含1100多个承诺。这些承诺的实现在多元分析中被视为因变量。结果表明,制度决定因素(联盟协议的采用,部长级控制和政策现状)极大地影响了实现承诺的机会,因此成为联盟政策产出的有力预测指标。相比之下,与政党的偏好相关的因素(政党之间的共识,政策距离,承诺显着性以及议会的多数支持)不会产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号