...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Academy of management learning & education >Solutions to the Credibility Crisis in Management Science
【24h】

Solutions to the Credibility Crisis in Management Science

机译：管理科学中的信用危机解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We argue that much academic misconduct can be explained as the result of social dilemmas occurring at two levels of management science. First, the career benefits associated with engaging in noncredible research practices (NCRPs; e.g., data manipulation, fabricating results, data hoarding, undisclosed HARKing) result in many academics choosing self-interest over collective welfare. These perverse incentives derive from journal gatekeepers who are pressed into a similar social dilemma; namely, an individual journal's status (i.e., its "impact factor") is likely to suffer from unilaterally implementing practices that help ensure the credibility of management science claims (e.g., dedicating journal space to strict replications, crowd-sourcing replications, data-submission requirements, in-house analysis checks, registered reports, Open Practice badges). Fortunately, research on social dilemmas and collective action offers solutions. For example, journal editors could pledge to publish a certain number of credibility boosting articles contingent on a proportion of their "peer" journals doing the same. Details for successful implementation of conditional pledges, other social dilemma solutions-including actions for management academics who support changes in journal practices (e.g., reviewer boycotts/buycotts), and insights on credibility-supportive journal practices from other fields-are provided.
机译：我们认为，很多学术上的不当行为可以解释为管理科学的两个层面上发生的社会困境的结果。首先，与从事不可信赖的研究实践（NCRP;例如数据处理，制造结果，数据ho积，未公开的HARKing）相关的职业利益导致许多学者选择了自利而不是集体福利。这些不正当的动机源于期刊看门人，他们被迫陷入类似的社会困境。即，单个期刊的状态（即其“影响因素”）可能会遭受单方面实施的实践的困扰，这些实践有助于确保管理科学主张的可信度（例如，将期刊空间专用于严格复制，众包复制，数据提交）要求，内部分析检查，注册报告，Open Practice徽章）。幸运的是，对社会困境和集体行动的研究提供了解决方案。例如，期刊编辑可以保证根据一定比例的“同行”期刊发表一定数量的信誉提升文章。提供了成功实施有条件承诺，其他社会困境解决方案的详细信息，包括针对支持期刊实践变化的管理学者采取的行动（例如，审查员抵制/买入），以及其他领域对信誉支持期刊实践的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号