...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Academy of management learning & education >BUILDING AND BREACHING BOUNDARIES AT ONCE: AN EXPLORATION OF HOW MANAGEMENT ACADEMICS AND PRACTITIONERS PERFORM BOUNDARY WORK IN EXECUTIVE CLASSROOMS
【24h】

BUILDING AND BREACHING BOUNDARIES AT ONCE: AN EXPLORATION OF HOW MANAGEMENT ACADEMICS AND PRACTITIONERS PERFORM BOUNDARY WORK IN EXECUTIVE CLASSROOMS

机译：一次建立和突破边界：管理学术和从业人员如何在执行性课堂中执行边界工作的探讨

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Based on an ethnographic study of exchanges between management academics and practitioners in an executive program, our research articulates a process perspective on how academics and practitioners engage in boundary work-how direct interaction strategies (boundary building or boundary breaching) shape their knowledge exchanges. Our findings suggest that to deal with relational insecurity, academics and practitioners use a set of planned and emergent strategies according to trial-and-error logics. In the beginning of an interaction episode, they draw intentionally on planned boundary-building strategies. If these are refused, they draw on emergent strategies of boundary breaching, which connect inside classroom roles with outside classroom roles in a more creative way. We show that each strategy triggers a different type of knowledge exchange, and that intentional boundary building triggers more limited knowledge exchanges (knowledge transfer) than emergent boundary breaching (new understandings). Our findings contribute to the boundary work literature and to the debate in management about a theory-practice gap by emphasizing the relational potential of academic-practitioner exchanges. We also suggest that if business schools loosen their programs' infrastructure and encourage trial-and-error interaction, they can increasingly become trading zones for academic-practitioner boundary work.
机译：基于对行政管理人员与执行人员之间的交流进行的人种志研究，我们的研究阐明了学者和从业人员如何参与边界工作的过程视角，即直接交互策略（边界建立或边界突破）如何影响他们的知识交流。我们的发现表明，为了解决关系不安全问题，学者和从业人员会根据试错逻辑使用一系列计划和紧急策略。在互动情节开始时，他们有意借鉴了计划中的边界建设策略。如果拒绝这些建议，他们将采用边界突破的新兴策略，以更富创意的方式将内部教室角色与外部教室角色联系起来。我们证明，每种策略都会触发不同类型的知识交流，并且有意识的边界建设触发的知识交流（知识转移）比紧急情况的边界突破（新的理解）要多。我们的发现通过强调学术从业人员交流的潜在关系，为边界工作文献和管理方面关于理论与实践之间的分歧的辩论做出了贡献。我们还建议，如果商学院放松其计划的基础设施并鼓励试错互动，它们可能会逐渐成为学术从业人员边界工作的交易区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号