首页> 外文期刊>The Academy of Management Perspectives >MATERNAL BODIES AS TABOO AT WORK: NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE MARGINALIZING OF SENIOR-LEVEL WOMEN IN ORGANIZATIONS
【24h】

MATERNAL BODIES AS TABOO AT WORK: NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE MARGINALIZING OF SENIOR-LEVEL WOMEN IN ORGANIZATIONS

机译:身为禁忌工作的身体:组织中高级女性的边缘化的新观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper contributes new perspectives to studies on women in management, proposing the concept of the "maternal" (or reproductive) female body as a different explanation for why women are underrepresented at high levels in organizations. It argues that assessments of capability among senior-level women may focus primarily on their potential (or actual) maternity rather than on performance. As a result, such women are often excluded from prestigious assignments. First, the paper observes hidden tendencies, within higher echelons at work, to classify maternal bodies as taboo. Drawing on the work of anthropologist Mary Douglas, the paper notes how maternal bodies among senior-women may be identified as "social pollutants" and a danger to productivity (Douglas, 1966). Second, the paper suggests how the marginalizing of senior-level women relates to medicalization of maternal bodies, which are described as governed by fluctuating hormones throughout and beyond the reproductive years. Such medical descriptions spill over into organizational contexts, and senior-women are treated as lacking competence to make rational judgments. The paper suggests that further research is required to explore deeply ingrained attitudes that associate maternal bodies with lowered cognition.
机译:本文为管理妇女的研究提供了新的视角,提出了“母体”(或生殖)女性身体的概念,以此来解释为什么女性在组织中的代表人数不足。它认为,对高级妇女的能力评估可能主要侧重于她们潜在的(或实际的)生育能力,而不是表现。结果,这类妇女常常被排除在享有声望的职务之外。首先,本文观察到在工作的高层人员中,将产妇的身体归类为禁忌的潜在倾向。借鉴人类学家玛丽·道格拉斯的工作,论文指出了如何将高龄妇女的孕产妇识别为“社会污染物”和对生产力的危害(Douglas,1966)。其次,该论文提出了高级妇女的边缘化与孕产妇的医疗化之间的关系,据描述,孕产妇在整个生育期及以后都将受到激素波动的影响。这种医学描述会渗入组织环境中,而高级女性则被视为缺乏做出理性判断的能力。该论文表明,需要进一步的研究来探索将母体与降低的认知联系在一起的根深蒂固的态度。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Academy of Management Perspectives》 |2017年第3期|239-252|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Liverpool, Org Studies, Management Sch, Liverpool, Merseyside, England;

    Univ Manchester, Org Psychol & Hlth, ALLIANCE Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, Lancs, England;

    Purdue Univ, Management, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA|Purdue Univ, Butler Ctr Leadership, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号