• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Academy of Management Perspectives >PARTNERSHIPS FOR PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT IN FRAGILE STATES: IDENTIFYING MISSING LINKS
【24h】

PARTNERSHIPS FOR PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT IN FRAGILE STATES: IDENTIFYING MISSING LINKS

机译：脆弱国家和平与发展的伙伴关系：确定缺失的环节

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Literature on partnerships has grown rapidly in the past decade across different disciplines. However, despite conceptual attention to the value of strategic multistakeholder collaboration to promote peace and reconciliation, challenges posed by post-conflict fragile contexts have barely been considered in empirical studies. In this article we contribute by bringing together debates from different partnership literatures and providing an overview of existing, relatively limited research insights on partnerships for peace in fragile states. We present a typology of different levels (local, national, and international) at which collaboration takes place and different types of partnerships (philanthropic, transactional, engagement, and transformative). This is illustrated with specific attention to Africa, where most fragile states are found, and to partnerships with transformative potential. The analysis suggests that the lowest-level (i.e., local) partnerships tend to exclude the national government, while the most recent international, multilaterally driven collaboration has not included business; national cases are most transformative but incidental and not yet leveraged internationally. Despite the interconnected nature of conflict and fragility issues, linkages between partnerships and partners at different levels are largely missing, offering potential for further development by a broad spectrum of scholars and thought leaders. Insights from extreme and unconventional contexts thus have relevance for management research more generally.
机译：在过去的十年间，跨学科的伙伴关系文献迅速增长。但是，尽管在概念上关注战略多利益相关方合作对促进和平与和解的价值，但实证研究几乎没有考虑到冲突后脆弱环境所带来的挑战。在本文中，我们将来自不同伙伴关系文献的辩论集中在一起，并提供了有关脆弱国家中的伙伴关系促进和平的现有，相对有限的研究见解的概述。我们介绍了进行协作的不同级别（本地，国家和国际）和不同类型的伙伴关系（慈善，交易，参与和变革）的类型。尤其要注意非洲（那里是最脆弱的国家）和具有变革潜力的伙伴关系。分析表明，最低级别（即本地）的合作伙伴关系倾向于将中央政府排除在外，而最新的国际，多边驱动的合作并未包括商业。国内案件最具变革性，但偶然，尚未在国际上得到利用。尽管冲突和脆弱性问题具有相互联系的性质，但在各个层次上的伙伴关系和合作伙伴之间的联系仍然缺失，这为广泛的学者和思想领袖提供了进一步发展的潜力。因此，来自极端和非常规环境的见解与管理研究更相关。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Academy of Management Perspectives》 |2015年第4期|422-437|共16页
  • 作者

    Kolk Ans; Lenfant Francois;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Amsterdam, Sch Business, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands;

    Univ Amsterdam, Sch Business, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号