• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>ACM Computing Surveys >A Survey on Assessment and Ranking Methodologies for User-Generated Content on the Web
【24h】

A Survey on Assessment and Ranking Methodologies for User-Generated Content on the Web

机译：网络上用户生成内容的评估和排名方法调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

User-generated content (UGC) on the Web, especially on social media platforms, facilitates the association of additional information with digital resources; thus, it can provide valuable supplementary content. However, UGC varies in quality and, consequently, raises the challenge of how to maximize its utility for a variety of end-users. This study aims to provide researchers and Web data curators with comprehensive answers to the following questions: What are the existing approaches and methods for assessing and ranking UGC? What features and metrics have been used successfully to assess and predict UGC value across a range of application domains? What methods can be effectively employed to maximize that value? This survey is composed of a systematic review of approaches for assessing and ranking UGC: results are obtained by identifying and comparing methodologies within the context of short text-based UGC on the Web. Existing assessment and ranking approaches adopt one of four framework types: the community-based framework takes into consideration the value assigned to content by a crowd of humans, the end-user-based framework adapts and personalizes the assessment and ranking process with respect to a single end-user, the designer-based framework encodes the software designer's values in the assessment and ranking method, and the hybrid framework employs methods from more than one of these types. This survey suggests a need for further experimentation and encourages the development of new approaches for the assessment and ranking of UGC.
机译：Web上（尤其是社交媒体平台上）的用户生成内容（UGC）促进了附加信息与数字资源的关联；因此，它可以提供有价值的补充内容。但是，UGC的质量各不相同，因此，提出了如何使各种最终用户的效用最大化的挑战。这项研究旨在为研究人员和Web数据管理员提供以下问题的全面解答：现有的评估和评级UGC的方法和方法是什么？哪些功能和指标已成功用于评估和预测一系列应用程序领域的UGC价值？可以有效采用哪些方法来最大化该价值？这项调查由对UGC的评估和排名方法的系统回顾组成：通过在基于Web的基于文本的短UGC的上下文中识别和比较方法，可以获得结果。现有的评估和排名方法采用以下四种框架类型之一：基于社区的框架考虑了人群分配给内容的价值，基于最终用户的框架对评估和排名过程进行了调整和个性化。对于单一的最终用户，基于设计者的框架使用评估和排名方法对软件设计者的价值进行编码，而混合框架则采用这些类型中不止一种的方法。这项调查表明需要进行进一步的试验，并鼓励开发新的方法来对教资会进行评估和排名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号