首页> 外文期刊>Acta Analytica >Analyticity and the Analysis Relation
【24h】

Analyticity and the Analysis Relation

机译:分析性与分析关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Quine famously argued that analyticity is indefinable, since there is no good account of analyticity in terms of synonymy, and intensions are of no help since there are no intensions. Yet if there are intensions, the question still remains as to the right account of analyticity in terms of them. On the assumption that intensions must be admitted, the present paper considers two such accounts. The first analyzes analyticity in terms of concept identity, and the second analyzes analyticity in terms of the analysis relation. The first fails in light of possible counterexamples. The second is defended, both by considering test cases of intuitively clear analyticities, and by developing the account in light of possible counterexamples.
机译:奎因(Quine)著名地指出,分析性是无法定义的,因为没有足够的同义词来解释分析性,而内涵也没有帮助,因为没有内涵。但是,如果存在内涵,那么就这些而言,对分析性的正确解释仍然存在问题。基于必须接受意图的假设,本文考虑了两个这样的解释。第一种是从概念同一性角度分析分析性,第二种是从分析关系角度分析分析性。鉴于可能的反例,第一个失败。第二种方法是通过考虑直观直观的分析测试用例,并根据可能的反例进行开发来辩护的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号