...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in building energy research >Sustainability and wood constructions: a review of green building rating systems and life-cycle assessment methods from a South African and developing world perspective
【24h】

Sustainability and wood constructions: a review of green building rating systems and life-cycle assessment methods from a South African and developing world perspective

机译:可持续发展和木材建设:南非和发展世界视角的绿色建筑评级系统和生命周期评估方法综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study reviews, from a South African and developing world perspective, green building rating tools and life-cycle assessment methods with a focus on wood constructions. Based on existing studies, it seems as if the well documented environmental benefits of using wood is not sufficiently reflected in the green building rating systems reviewed. Although life-cycle-assessment is recognized as the best way to holistically evaluate the environmental impacts of a building, it is resource intensive, can be highly complex, and is dependent on the availability of accurate data. The life-cycle assessment research results on which green building rating tools were based, were mostly from colder, northern hemisphere developed countries. This might result in an over-emphasis on the operating energy requirements of buildings at the expense of embodied energy and the importance of material choices. We therefore conclude that there is a critical need for local life cycle assessment based research in South Africa and other developing countries on the environmental impacts of different building products and processes.
机译:这项研究审查了南非和发展世界的观点,绿色建筑评级工具和生命周期评估方法,重点是木结构。基于现有研究,似乎在审查的绿色建筑评级系统中没有充分地反映出使用木材的良好的环境效益。虽然生命周期评估被认为是全面评估建筑物环境影响的最佳方法,但它是资源密集型的,可以高度复杂,取决于准确数据的可用性。生命周期评估研究结果,绿色建筑等级工具所依据,主要来自北半球发达国家的寒冷。这可能导致过度强调建筑物的经营能源要求,以牺牲体现的能量和材料选择的重要性。因此,我们得出结论,在南非和其他发展中国家对不同建筑产品和流程的环境影响的基于地方生命周期评估的批判性需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号