首页> 外文期刊>Aerospace international >Pots calling kettles - protectionism and subsidy in the world airline industry
【24h】

Pots calling kettles - protectionism and subsidy in the world airline industry

机译:煲水壶-世界航空业的保护主义和补贴

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is not often that Willie Walsh and Michael O'Leary may be on the same side, or at least share similar sentiments. But the growing convergence of leading US airlines and certain European carriers over the threat posed by the Gulf airlines must hint of such a paradox. In December, Lufthansa and Air France-KLM wrote to the European Commission (CEC) demanding that traffic rights be withdrawn from Emirates, Qatar Airways and Etihad. Their grounds were that the Gulf big three were acting in an uncompetitive manner as a result of receiving government subsidies. Almost simultaneously, the US airlines Delta, United and American asked much the same of the Obama Administration. They assert that the Gulf big three have received some $40bn over the decade in subsidies - soft loans, subsidised airport charges, lower labour costs due to curbs on unions, infrastructure investment and such like.
机译:威利·沃尔什(Willie Walsh)和迈克尔·奥利里(Michael O'Leary)常常不在同一边,或者至少有相似的想法。但是,美国主要航空公司和某些欧洲航空公司在海湾航空公司构成的威胁方面日益趋同,这必然暗示了这种悖论。去年12月,汉莎航空和法航荷航致函欧洲委员会(CEC),要求从阿联酋,卡塔尔航空和阿提哈德撤回交通权。他们的理由是,海湾三大巨头由于获得政府补贴而表现不佳。几乎同时,美国航空公司达美航空,美国联合航空和美国航空对奥巴马政府的要求大致相同。他们断言,海湾三巨头在过去十年中已获得约400亿美元的补贴-软贷款,补贴的机场费用,由于限制工会而降低的劳动力成本,基础设施投资等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号