...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>African security review >South Sudan power-sharing agreement R-ARCSS: The same thing expecting different results
【24h】

South Sudan power-sharing agreement R-ARCSS: The same thing expecting different results

机译：南苏丹权力共享协议R-ARCSS：同一件事期待不同的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To date, two power-sharing agreements have been signed since civil war broke out in South Sudan in December 2013. The first agreement collapsed just after one year when renewed fighting broke out in July 2016. The second agreement signed in September 2018 continues to experience implementation challenges and ceasefire violations, while some of the parties declined to sign it. This article explores the role of distrust in stagnating the power-sharing agreements, and how trust building could be a game-changer. In a semi-structured in-depth interview, 29 key stakeholders were interviewed, including the conflict parties, mediators, eminent South Sudanese personalities, scholars and civil society leaders. Five major themes emerged: historical conflicts, estranged political relationships, power struggles, resource control and ethnic violence (not included in this article). The results suggest the conflict is sustained by a trust deficit among the parties arising from unresolved historical conflicts to estranged political relationships and power struggles. The article recommends transitional justice approaches for trust building and sustainable agreements.
机译：迄今为止，自2013年12月南苏丹内战爆发以来，已经签署了两项权力共享协议。第一项协议在2016年7月爆发新的一年后瓦解。2018年9月签署的第二项协议继续存在执行方面的挑战和违反停火的行为，而一些当事方拒绝签署。本文探讨了不信任在停滞权力共享协议中的作用，以及建立信任如何改变游戏规则。在半结构化的深入访谈中，对29个主要利益相关者进行了访谈，其中包括冲突党，调解员，著名的南苏丹名人，学者和民间社会领袖。出现了五个主要主题：历史冲突，疏远的政治关系，权力斗争，资源控制和种族暴力（本文未包括）。结果表明，冲突由未解决的历史冲突，疏远的政治关系和权力斗争引起的当事方之间的信任赤字得以维持。本文建议采用过渡司法方法建立信任和达成可持续协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号