• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Air Force Magazine >Aperture
【24h】

Aperture

机译：光圈

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Soon after the Pentagon released its 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review earlier this year, a dissatisfied Congress asked a bipartisan panel of experts to look it over and give a second opinion. The panel has reported back, with a blunt conclusion: The US military isn't big enough to do the stated job, and the Budget Control Act, which inflicts deep defense cuts through sequestration, must be repealed. Now. Sequestration has imposed a "readiness crisis," and Congress should appropriate funds to reverse it "on an emergency basis," according to the 10-member National Defense Panel, co-chaired by former Defense Secretary William J. Perry and retired Army Gen. John P. Abizaid. Sequestration constitutes a "serious strategic misstep" that is "ultimately self-defeating" and will put the US in grave danger for years to come, the panel said in its report, "Ensuring a Strong US Defense for the Future." The forces called for in the QDR "clearly exceed" those resulting from sequester-level spending, the panel pointed out, making the national military strategy impossible to execute. The members also flatly rejected the Pentagon's underlying notion that expected funding should play a big role in determining strategy.
机译：五角大楼在今年早些时候发布了《 2014年四年防务评估》后不久，不满的国会要求两党专家小组对其进行审查，并给出第二意见。专家小组作了报告，得出了一个直截了当的结论：美军规模不足以完成既定的工作，必须废除《预算控制法》。现在。由前国防部长威廉·佩里和已退休的陆军将军共同组成的由十人组成的国防小组说，隔离行动已经造成了“战备危机”，国会应该拨出资金以“在紧急情况下”扭转这种状况。约翰·阿比扎德（John P. Abizaid）。专家小组在报告中说：“封存是一种“严重的战略失误”，“最终会自毁”，并将使美国在未来数年处于严重危险之中。专家小组指出，《四年防务评估》中要求的力量“明显超过了”隔离国级开支所导致的力量，这使得国家军事战略无法执行。成员们还断然拒绝了五角大楼的基本观点，即预期的资金应在确定战略中发挥重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号