【24h】

Know Thyself

机译:认识自己

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reading Peter Dunn's critique of tactics in general and the ECM tactics of 1966 in particular, I have to say that whatever was going on in 1966 improved by the time I got to the 42nd TEWS, then flying EB-66s at Korat in 1971-72 ["Letters: Lessons Not Learned," October, p. 8]. I wish I had kept a diary. Forty years have passed so I don't recall the details, but I do recall that our EWOs didn't bother jamming long-range surveillance/GCI radars; they were too far away for jamming to be effective. Instead, the focus was on short-range and terminal threats: SA-2 guidance, gun laying radars (when they were athreat), height finding radars, fighter attack/intercept (Al) radars, and some communications. Jamming was selective, so I doubt that any friendly GCI site ever saw any jamming, unless by accident.
机译:阅读彼得·邓恩对战术的一般性评论,尤其是1966年的ECM战术,我必须说,当我到达第42枚TEWS时,1966年发生的一切都得到了改善,然后在1971-72年在Korat驾驶EB-66 [“信件:未学到的教训,”十月,第152页。 8]。我希望我写日记。四十年过去了,所以我不记得细节了,但是我确实记得我们的EWO并没有干扰远程监视/ GCI雷达。它们距离干扰太远,无法发挥作用。取而代之的是,重点放在短程和终端威胁上:SA-2制导,炮击雷达(处于威胁状态时),测高雷达,战斗机攻击/拦截(Al)雷达以及一些通信设备。干扰是选择性的,因此我怀疑任何GCI友好站点是否会遇到干扰,除非是偶然的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号