• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Air & space power journal >Self-evaluation: A Disconnect In Our Values
【24h】

Self-evaluation: A Disconnect In Our Values

机译：自我评价：我们价值观的脱节

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the last two years, I've drafted a dozen performance reports and recommendations for officer promotion. That may seem like a reasonable number that ought not be too burdensome for one officer to handle, but I find it quite unsatisfactory. Why? Because I haven't been in a supervisory role in the last two years. I drafted each of these documents at the request of officers whose supervisors were unwilling to prepare the documents and required the officers being rated to put together their own reports and recommendations.rnSelf-evaluation (the practice of writing our own-or allowing or directing our subordinates to write their own-performance reports and promotion recommendations) is forbidden. The governing guidance is unambiguous: "Do not have the ratee write or draft any portion of his or her own performance report. . . . [Senior raters] will ensure no subordinate commander/supervisor asks, or allows, an officer to draft or prepare his or her own PRF [promotion recommendation form]. . . . No officer will be asked to draft or prepare his or her own PRF."1 Nevertheless, this practice seems to be growing in our Air Force.
机译：在过去的两年中，我起草了许多绩效报告和提拔官员的建议。这似乎是一个合理的数字，对于一个军官来说应该不会太繁重，但我发现它并不令人满意。为什么？因为最近两年我没有担任过监督职务。我应主管不愿准备文件的官员的要求起草了每份文件，并要求被评定的官员将自己的报告和建议汇总在一起。rn自我评估（编写我们自己的文件或允许或指导我们的文件的做法）禁止下属撰写自己的绩效报告和晋升建议）。指导方针是明确的：“没有让陪审员撰写或草拟自己的绩效报告的任何部分……[高级陪审员]将确保下属指挥官/上司不会要求或允许官员起草或准备工作。他或她自己的PRF [晋升推荐表]……不会要求任何官员起草或准备自己的PRF。“ 1然而，这种做法在我们的空军中似乎正在增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号