In a story in last week’s issue (33 ANR 104), ANR asked FAA why it does not include communities upfront in the design process of airspace revisions rather than putting the burden on them to propose ways to mitigate noise impact after the agency has implemented new flight paths, which is what happened in the FAA’s Northern California Metroplex project. FAA’s initial response did not directly address that question. The agency has sent the following additional comment: “Over the years, the FAA has refined its community engagement process. Today, we follow a robust engagement strategy that integrates input from communities, airports, and local elected officials.”
展开▼
机译：在上周的问题（33 ANR 104）的故事中，ANR要求FAA为什么它不包括空域修订的设计过程中的社区，而不是为他们提出负担，以便在原子能机构实施新的噪声影响后提出减轻噪声影响的方法 飞行路径，这是FAA北加州Metroplex项目中发生的事情。 FAA的初步反应没有直接解决这个问题。 原子能机构已发出以下附加评论：“多年来，美国联邦航空局已改善其社区参与过程。 Today, we follow a robust engagement strategy that integrates input from communities, airports, and local elected officials.”
展开▼
