• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >The Seligman-Edgeworth Debate About the Analysis of Tax Incidence: The Advent of Mathematical Economics, 1892-1910
【24h】

The Seligman-Edgeworth Debate About the Analysis of Tax Incidence: The Advent of Mathematical Economics, 1892-1910

机译：关于税收发生率分析的塞利格曼·埃奇沃思辩论：数学经济学的出现，1892-1910年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Seligman lived another three decades after the publication of Edge-worth's 1910 article but saw no need to alter his views at all about the character of advanced mathematical methods in economics, He did remark about the limitations of the mathematical approach, and his objection to impractical theorems reappeared in his text, in other books, and in his college lectures that he wrote over the remaining decades of his life (Seligman 1929: 30-31; Allen [1927-1928] 1992: 203). He took no notice at all of Edgeworth's 1910 article and did not engage him about the methodological principle embodied in the assumption of "unverified probability." Edgeworth lived sixteen additional years beyond the publication of his 1910 paper and to the best of my knowledge also said little more about his debate with Seligman, although he continued to review economics books and publish important articles on theoretical statistics and index numbers. He also remained the editor of the Economic Journal up until the day before his death in 1926.
机译：塞利格曼在《埃奇沃思》（Edge-worth）在1910年发表的文章发表后还活了三十年，但他认为根本没有必要改变他对经济学中先进数学方法的特性的看法，他确实谈到了数学方法的局限性以及对不切实际的反对意见。定理再次出现在他的著作，其他书籍以及他在余下的几十年里写的大学演讲中（Seligman 1929：30-31; Allen [1927-1928] 1992：203）。他对Edgeworth在1910年发表的所有文章一无所知，也没有使他对“未证实的概率”假设中体现的方法论原则感兴趣。 Edgeworth在他1910年论文发表之后还活了16年，据我所知，尽管他继续审查经济学著作并发表有关理论统计和指数的重要文章，但据我所知，他与塞利格曼的辩论也很少。直到1926年去世前一天，他还是《经济日报》的编辑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号