...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Neuroradiology >Detection and Characterization of Intracranial Aneurysms with 16-Channel Multidetector Row CT Angiography: A Prospective Comparison of Volume-Rendered Images and Digital Subtraction Angiography
【24h】

Detection and Characterization of Intracranial Aneurysms with 16-Channel Multidetector Row CT Angiography: A Prospective Comparison of Volume-Rendered Images and Digital Subtraction Angiography

机译:16通道多排行CT血管造影术对颅内动脉瘤的检测和特征:容积成像和数字减影血管造影术的前瞻性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to compare multidetector row CT angiography (MDCTA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our blinded prospective study, 85 patients with suspected intracranial aneurysm (47 women, 38 men; age range, 19–83 years) underwent both 16-channel MDCTA and DSA. The MDCT angiograms were interpreted for the presence, location, size, ratio of the neck to the dome (N/D ratio), and lobularity of the aneurysms and relationship of the aneurysm with the adjacent arterial branches, by using volume-rendering techniques. MDCTA and DSA images (reference standard) were interpreted by 2 independent readers, and the results were compared. RESULTS: A total of 93 aneurysms were detected at DSA in 71 patients, whereas no aneurysms were detected in 14 patients. Compared with DSA, the overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MDCTA on a per-aneurysm basis were 92.5%, 93.3%, and 92.6%, respectively, for both independent readers. For aneurysms of <3 mm, however, MDCTA had a sensitivity of 74.1% for reader 1 and 77.8% for reader 2. There was excellent agreement between readers in the detection of aneurysms ( = 0.822). In addition, MDCTA was also accurate in determining N/D ratio of aneurysms, aneurysm lobularity, and adjacent arterial branches. CONCLUSION: MDCTA is accurate in the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms and can be used as a reliable alternative imaging technique to DSA in selected cases.
机译:背景与目的:我们的研究目的是比较 多排CT血管造影(MDCTA)和数字减影 血管造影(DSA)在颅内的检测和表征 资料和方法:在我们的双盲前瞻性研究中,有85 名可疑颅内动脉瘤患者(47名女性,38 男性;年龄范围为19-83岁)均接受了16频道的 MDCTA和DSA。 MDCT血管造影照片可解释 的存在,位置,大小,颈部与穹顶的比率(N / D 比率)以及小动脉瘤的小叶状和< sup> 通过使用容积绘制 技术使邻近动脉分支的动脉瘤。由2位独立读者解读MDCTA和DSA图像(参考标准),并比较结果。 结果:DSA中共检出93例动脉瘤,其中93例。 > 患者,而在14例患者中未发现动脉瘤。 与DSA相比,每个动脉瘤的MDCTA的总体敏感性,特异性和 准确性两位独立读者的分别为92.5%,93.3%, 和92.6%。但是,对于<3 mm的动脉瘤 ,MDCTA对阅读器 1的敏感性为74.1%,对阅读器2的敏感性为77.8%。 MDCTA在确定动脉瘤, 动脉瘤小叶和邻近动脉分支的N / D比方面也很准确。 结论:MDCTA是准确的可以在颅内动脉瘤的检测和表征中进行 ,并且可以在某些情况下用作DSA的可靠替代 成像技术。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Neuroradiology》 |2007年第1期|00000060-00000067|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Radiology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

    Department of Radiology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

    Department of Radiology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

    Department of Neurosurgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

    Department of Neurosurgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

    Department of Radiology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号