LETTERS TO THE EDITORS

首页> 外文期刊>American Scientist >LETTERS TO THE EDITORS

【24h】

LETTERS TO THE EDITORS

机译：致编辑

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

To the Editors: We add two comments to David Resn-ik's essay "A Troublesome Tradition" (January-February). First, it seems that journal editors increasingly are reluctant to make judgments as opposed to decisions. In the old days, editors who faced conflicting reviews would read the paper themselves. These days, the trend-at least for some editors-seems to be to ask for more reviews to break apparent ties, perhaps a reflection of the increased specialization of research. As a result, editors have become more like boards of elections. (It would be good to hear if others have experienced this because we understand that our experiences are not statistically significant.) Second, the proliferation of journals and the demand for more reviews (see above) has placed an increased burden on reviewers, particularly the conscientious ones. Academic institutions, although supportive of their faculty's peer-review activities, are not developing reward criteria that take into account the time needed to execute those activities properly.

机译：致编辑：我们在David Resn-ik的文章“麻烦的传统”（1月至2月）中添加了两条评论。首先，期刊编辑似乎越来越不愿意做出判断而不是做出决定。在过去，面对矛盾的编辑会自己阅读论文。如今，至少对于某些编辑而言，这种趋势似乎是要求更多的评论来打破明显的联系，这也许反映了研究专业化程度的提高。结果，编辑变得更像选举委员会。（很高兴听到其他人是否经历过这种情况，因为我们知道我们的经验在统计上并不重要。）其次，期刊的激增以及对更多审稿的需求（参见上文）给审稿人，尤其是审稿人增加了负担。认真的。学术机构虽然支持教师的同行评审活动，但并未制定将适当执行这些活动所需的时间考虑在内的奖励标准。

著录项

来源
《American Scientist》 |2011年第2期|p.99-101|共3页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Letter to the Editor Comments on the “Letter to the editor” by M.-L. You and C.-M. Shu (Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2010;100:367–369) as response to the “Letter to the editor” by M. Malow and K.-D. Wehrstedt (Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2009;98:885–886) [J] . K. D. Wehrstedt, M. Malow Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry . 2011,第1期

机译：致编辑的信M.-L对“致编辑的信”的评论。您和C.-M. Shu（《热分析与色度学杂志》，2010年； 100：367-369）是对M. Malow和K.-D的“致编辑的信”的回应。 Wehrstedt（热分析与量热杂志，2009； 98：885-886）
2. Letter to the Editor Letters to the Editor should be submitted online to www.editorialmanager.com/amsurg [J] . Alireza Hamidian Jahromi, Richard Wigle, Asser M. Youssef The American surgeon. . 2011,第12期

机译：致编辑的信致编辑的信应在线提交至www.editorialmanager.com/amsurg
3. Editor's note concerning letter to the editor by DE Roth and response to letter to the editor by V Bhatia et al. [J] . Shetty PS European journal of clinical nutrition . 2010,第8期

机译：关于DE Roth给编辑的信以及V Bhatia等人写给编辑的信的编者注。
4. LETTER FROM THE ASSOCIATE EDITORS [C] . Rainer Gemulla International conference on very large data bases . 2015

机译：副编辑的信
5. How S. C. Daily Newspapers Framed the Removal of the Confederate Flag from the State House Grounds in 2015 Through Letters to the Editor and Editorials [D] . Anderson, Thomas Craig. 2018

机译：S. C.日报如何通过致编辑和社论的信来构筑2015年从州议会大厦拆除同盟国国旗的框架
6. Letter to the Editors: Concerning Divergent clinical outcomes of alpha-glucosidase enzyme replacement therapy in two siblings with infantile-onset Pompe disease treated in the symptomatic or pre-symptomatic state by Takashi et al. and Letter to the Editors by Ortolano et al. [O] . Anne Schänzer, Kerstin Giese, Lara Viergutz, 2017

机译：致编辑的信：Takashi等人有关α-葡萄糖苷酶替代疗法在有症状或症状前状态下接受治疗的两个婴儿发作的庞贝病兄弟姐妹中的不同临床结果。和Ortolano等人写给编辑的信。
7. Letter to the Editors: Concerning “Divergent clinical outcomes of alpha-glucosidase enzyme replacement therapy in two siblings with infantile-onset Pompe disease treated in the symptomatic or pre-symptomatic state” by Takashi et al. and Letter to the Editors by Ortolano et al. [O] . Anne Schänzer, Kerstin Giese, Lara Viergutz, 2017

机译：致编辑的信：关于“在症状性或症状前状态下治疗的婴儿期发作的pompe病的两个兄弟姐妹中α-葡萄糖苷酶替代治疗的不同临床结果”，Takashi等人。和Ortolano等人给编辑的信。

LETTERS TO THE EDITORS

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅