...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The American Sociologist >Towards a Philosophy of Containment: Reading Goffman in the 21st Century
【24h】

Towards a Philosophy of Containment: Reading Goffman in the 21st Century

机译：走向遏制哲学：阅读21世纪的戈夫曼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

On the occasion of the re-publication of Erving Goffman’s Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order, including the remarkable appendix, “Insanity of Place,” the authors propose new ways of reading Goffman’s work in order to highlight his attention to havoc and containment. Goffman’s “Insanity of Place,” explores the phenomenon of mental illness by asserting that it is an instance of havoc, a symbolic and practical condition that disrupts the social order of life, and one that must be contained. By situating this essay at the center of Goffman’s oeuvre they examine Goffman’s “philosophy of containment,” and trace its trajectory from Asylums, Stigma and “The Insanity of Place” to its full crystallization in Frame Analysis. The authors offer a generative reading of havoc and containment in order to understand the incoherence, irrationality, unreason, incomprehensibility and unbearableness of social life and the imperative to preserve social order from collapsing, dissolving or imploding. This reading enables us to see the cracks in the social order and understand containment as the constant effort exerted to recuperate transgressions and deviations back into that order. Goffman’s analysis becomes an opening into engagements with the work of Judith Butler and Michel Foucault around the notion of the normative order and the issues of containment and transgression. Thinking through Goffman’s philosophy of containment as the framework for an analysis of socialization, normalization, and social ordering affords an approach to thinking macro-micro linkages of order and instability that confront both our contemporary society and the discipline of sociology.
机译：在重新公开欧文·高夫曼的公共关系：公共秩序的微观研究，包括引人注目的附录“地方的疯狂”之际，作者提出了阅读高夫曼作品的新方法，以强调他对破坏和破坏的关注。遏制。戈夫曼（Goffman）的“精神错乱”，断言精神病是一种破坏行为的实例，是破坏社会生活秩序的象征性现实条件，是必须加以遏制的一种现象，探讨了精神疾病的现象。通过将这篇文章放在高夫曼作品的中心，他们研究了高夫曼的“遏制哲学”，并从庇护，污名和“地方精神错乱”中追溯了它的轨迹，直至其在框架分析中的完整结晶。为了理解社会生活的不连贯，不合理，不合理，不理解，无法理解和无法忍受，以及保持社会秩序免于崩溃，崩溃或崩溃的必要性，作者提供了对破坏和遏制的泛泛解读。这种阅读使我们能够看到社会秩序中的裂痕，并能够理解遏制，因为人们不断努力使违法和背叛恢复到那个秩序。高夫曼（Goffman）的分析为朱迪思·巴特勒（Judith Butler）和米歇尔·福柯（Michel Foucault）围绕规范秩序的概念以及遏制和犯罪问题提供了契机。通过考虑戈夫曼的遏制哲学，作为分析社会化，正常化和社会秩序的框架，为思考当今社会和社会学学科面临的秩序与不稳定的宏观微观联系提供了一种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号