The relationship between visual and vocal attractiveness in males and females as evaluated by men and women was investigated. Participants rated the attractiveness of voices and static faces or voices and moving faces. Rubenstein (2005. Psychological Science, 16, 759-762) suggested that dynamic and static faces are judged by different evaluative standards. Results from the reported experiment suggest that for male participants there was a positive correlation between female vocal and visual (moving or static face) attractiveness. Women rated with higher voice attractiveness were rated as having more attractive faces. For female participants there was a positive correlation between male vocal and moving visual attractiveness but not between male vocal and static visual attractiveness. In addition, no significant correlation between the attractiveness of male static faces and that of male moving faces was found, highlighting differences in rated attractiveness when judging either moving or static faces (Rubenstein, A. J. 2005. Psychological Science, 16, 759-762). Finally, there was no correlation between vocal and visual attractiveness (moving or static) for same-sex judgements. Results are discussed with regard to perceptual and evolutionary perspectives.
展开▼
机译：研究了由男性和女性评估的男性和女性的视觉和声音吸引力之间的关系。与会者对声音和静态面孔或声音和动态面孔的吸引力进行了评估。 Rubenstein（2005. Psychological Science，16，759-762）提出，动态和静态面孔是由不同的评估标准来判断的。报告的实验结果表明，对于男性参与者，女性的声音和视觉（活动或静态面部）吸引力之间存在正相关。语音吸引力较高的女性被评为面部更具吸引力。对于女性参与者，男性的声音和运动的视觉吸引力之间存在正相关，而男性的声音和静态的视觉吸引力之间没有正相关。此外，未发现男性静态面孔与男性活动面孔的吸引力之间存在显着相关性，突出了判断运动面孔或静态面孔时额定吸引力的差异（Rubenstein，A. J. 2005. Psychological Science，16，759-762）。最后，对于同性判断，声音和视觉吸引力（移动或静态）之间没有关联。讨论了关于感知和进化观点的结果。
展开▼
