• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Antipode >What You See Is (Not) What You Get? The Taiwan Question, Geo-economic Realities, and the 'China Threat' Imaginary
【24h】

What You See Is (Not) What You Get? The Taiwan Question, Geo-economic Realities, and the 'China Threat' Imaginary

机译：您看到的是（不是）您得到的？台湾问题，地缘经济现实与“中国威胁”的想象

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite emergent trends of geo-economic integration between nation-states, the role of realist-driven geopolitical calculation appears highly enduring. This paper explores the potential contradictions between state-centric geopolitical concerns and transnational geo-economic formation through an exploration of China-US tensions over Taiwan, a territory of indeterminate geo-legal status and which China regards as its own province. I consider how the Taiwan Relations Act, a domestic public law of the US that frames US-Taiwan relations and has a major influence on East Asian geopolitics, could contradict emergent "China region", and possibly even China-US, geo-economic integration. This is because the US-sustained arms sales to Taiwan rest on imagining and containing China as a "threat", while geo-economic integration entails enrolling China as a strategic partner, if not an ally. Consequently, the Taiwan issue could stifle the enhancement of Sino-American relations at a historical juncture when the Chinese and American economies are more intertwined than ever.
机译：尽管民族国家之间出现了地缘经济一体化的新趋势，但现实主义者驱动的地缘政治计算的作用似乎是持久的。本文通过探讨中美在台湾上的紧张关系来探讨以国家为中心的地缘政治关切与跨国地缘经济形成之间的潜在矛盾。台湾是一个地域法律地位不确定的地区，被中国视为自己的省份。我认为《台湾关系法》是美国的美国国内公法，它构筑了美台关系，并对东亚地缘政治产生了重大影响，它如何与新兴的“中国地区”甚至中美地缘经济一体化相矛盾。 。这是因为美国维持对台湾的军售只是想像并把中国视为“威胁”，而地缘经济一体化则要求中国成为战略伙伴，即使不是盟友。因此，在中美经济比以往更加相互交织的历史关头，台湾问题可能扼杀中美关系的加强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号