• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Antitrust Bulletin >Measuring Antitrust Damages in the Presence of Foreign Government Regulation
【24h】

Measuring Antitrust Damages in the Presence of Foreign Government Regulation

机译：在外国政府监管下衡量反托拉斯损害赔偿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 14, 2018, reversed the Second Circuit’s 2016 decision to vacate a $147 million judgment against two Chinese companies, who allegedly fixed vitamin C prices. The high court held that courts should give foreign governments’ statements “respectful consideration” but are not bound by another country’s description of its own laws. Going forward, courts will need to evaluate a foreign government’s statements when defendants claim a contradiction between U.S. law and foreign regulations as a defense. When government regulation and private cartelization overlap, complications arise because the foreign companies may be liable for their anticompetitive conduct that was beyond the requirement of and might even have influenced foreign government policies. Using two illustrative cases ( In Re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation and Resco Products v. Bosai Minerals ), we analyze the impact of the price floor and export quotas and propose a new, workable methodology for measuring antitrust damages attributable to the private cartel in the presence of foreign regulation.
机译：2018年6月14日，美国最高法院推翻了第二巡回法庭2016年的裁决，该裁决撤销了针对两家中国公司的1.47亿美元判决，这些公司据称固定了维生素C的价格。高等法院认为，法院应该对外国政府的陈述给予“尊重”，但不受另一国对其本国法律的描述的约束。展望未来，当被告声称美国法律与外国法规之间的矛盾作为辩护时，法院将需要评估外国政府的陈述。当政府法规和私人卡特尔化重叠时，就会出现复杂情况，因为外国公司可能会对他们的反竞争行为承担责任，这超出了要求，甚至可能影响了外国政府的政策。使用两个示例性案例（在Re Vitamin C反托拉斯诉讼和Resco Products诉Bosai Minerals案）中，我们分析了底价和出口配额的影响，并提出了一种新的可行方法来衡量存在的私人卡特尔造成的反托拉斯损害。外国法规。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号