• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Antitrust Bulletin >Online music: antitrust and copyright perspectives
【24h】

Online music: antitrust and copyright perspectives

机译：在线音乐：反托拉斯和版权观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

An antitrust and copyright analysis of online music services suggests a number of things. Perhaps the most obvious is that various licensing agreements between individual record companies entering into joint ventures or between the joint ventures themselves are unlikely to be sheltered by copyright law. The antitrust implications are less clear. Nor is it clear that an antitrust response is appropriate since the breadth of the market and low entry barriers may mean the industry equilibrium is a fairly competitive state. On the other hand, a strong possibility exists that the industry will fall through one of the "cracks" of antitrust. Specifically, agreements among record companies may not fall within any per se categories. In addition, a possibly broad market definition may mean they escape prohibition under the rule of reason. In short, nothing in the antitrust laws may prevent the development of a duopoly or oligopoly market structure. If this should happen, interjoint-yenture coordination with the necessity of agreements could follow. This too would fall outside the reach of the antitrust laws.
机译：对在线音乐服务的反托拉斯和版权分析表明了很多事情。也许最明显的是，唱片公司之间或合资公司之间的各种许可协议不太可能受版权法的保护。反托拉斯的含义还不清楚。由于市场的广度和低进入壁垒可能意味着行业均衡处于相当竞争的状态，因此也不清楚反托拉斯回应是否适当。另一方面，该行业极有可能陷入反托拉斯“裂缝”之一。具体而言，唱片公司之间的协议可能不属于任何本身的类别。此外，可能广阔的市场定义可能意味着它们在理性规则下可以逃脱禁令。简而言之，反托拉斯法中的任何内容都不能阻止双头垄断或寡头垄断市场结构的发展。如果应该做到这一点，则可以在必要的情况下进行联合体之间的协调。这也将超出反托拉斯法的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号