• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Suicide Research >Giving up Self-Injury: A Comparison of Everyday Social and Personal Resources in Past Versus Current Self-Injurers
【24h】

Giving up Self-Injury: A Comparison of Everyday Social and Personal Resources in Past Versus Current Self-Injurers

机译：放弃自我伤害：过去与当前自我伤害者日常社交和个人资源的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Self-injury represents a common yet perplexing set of behaviors, considered difficult to treat. The current study aimed to identify social and personal resources that may aid in cessation of self-injury. A community sample of 312 participants completed an online questionnaire. In line with Brown and Williams (20073. Brown , S. , & Williams , K. ( 2007 ). Past and recent deliberate self-harm: Emotion and coping strategy differences . Journal of Clinical Psychology , 63 ( 9 ), 791 - 803 .[CrossRef], [Web of Science ®]View all references), we compared all self-injurers (current and past) (106, 34%) with those who had never self-injured (206, 66%), and then current (38, 12.2%) with past self-injurers (68, 21.8%). Overall, self-injurers reported significantly lower levels of perceived social support, social connectedness, resilience, self-esteem, and life satisfaction compared to those with no such history. Further analysis indicated that family support, self-esteem, resilience, and satisfaction with life were significantly better for past compared to current self-injurers (at the p < 0.01 level). Logistic regression suggested that self-injurers could be distinguished from non self-injurers on Self-esteem and Social Connectedness. A further logistic regression suggested that past self-injurers could be distinguished from current self-injurers by their level of Resilience. The research has important preventive and clinical implications.View full textDownload full textKeywordscessation, life satisfaction, protective factors, resilience, self-esteem, social connectedness, self-injuryRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2012.667333
机译：自伤代表了一套常见但令人困惑的行为，被认为难以治疗。当前的研究旨在确定可能有助于停止自我伤害的社会和个人资源。 312名参与者的社区样本完成了在线问卷。符合Brown和Williams（20073. Brown，S.＆Williams，K.（2007）。过去和最近刻意的自我伤害：情感和应对策略的差异。临床心理学杂志，63（9），791-803 。[CrossRef]，[Web of Science®]查看所有参考文献），我们比较了所有自伤者（当前和过去）（106％，34％）与从未自伤者（206％，66％），然后当前（38，12.2％）与过去的自残者（68，21.8％）。总体而言，与没有此类经历的人相比，自我伤害者的感知到的社会支持，社交联系，韧性，自尊和生活满意度显着降低。进一步的分析表明，与当前的自我伤害相比，过去的家庭支持，自尊，韧性和生活满意度明显更好（p <0.01）。 Logistic回归表明，在自尊和社交联系方面，自我伤害者可以与非自我伤害者区分开。进一步的逻辑回归表明，过去的自我伤害者可以通过其韧性水平与当前的自我伤害者区分开。该研究具有重要的预防和临床意义。查看全文下载全文关键词戒断，生活满意度，保护因素，适应力，自尊，社交联系，自我伤害相关的var addthis_config = { ，netvibes，twitter，technorati，可口，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2012.667333

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号