• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Artificial intelligence >Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation
【24h】

Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation

机译：虚假辩论的人工辩论助手

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automated reasoning tools, the objective is not to replace reasoning, but to guide the user.'s production of arguments. Two systems are presented, ARGUE! and ARGUMED based on DEFLOG. The focus is on defeasible argumentation with an eye on the law. Argument assistants for defeasible argumentation naturally correspond to a view of the application of law as dialectical theory construction. The experiments provide insights into the design of argument assistants, and show the pros and cons of different ways of representing argumentative data. The development of the argumentation theories underlying the systems has culminated in the logical system DEFLOG that formalizes the interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions. DEFLOG introduces an innovative use of conditionals expressing support and attack. This allows the expression of warrants for support and attack, making it a transparent and flexible system of defeasible argumentation.
机译：本文讨论了实验论证辅助工具。与自动推理工具相反，其目的不是取代推理，而是指导用户产生论据。提出了两个系统，ARGUE！和基于DEFLOG的ARGUMED。着眼于法律，着眼于不可行的论证。可废止论证的论证助手自然对应于法律作为辩证理论建构的应用的观点。实验提供了对辩论助手设计的见解，并展示了代表辩论数据的不同方式的利弊。系统基础的论证理论的发展最终达到了逻辑系统DEFLOG的水平，该逻辑形式化了对表面现象合理假设的解释。 DEFLOG引入了创新的条件表达方式来表达支持和攻击。这样就可以表达支持和攻击的手令，使其成为可辩驳的透明灵活的论证系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号