首页> 外文期刊>Asia Pacific Viewpoint >Japan–China rivalry: What role does the East Asia Summit play?
【24h】

Japan–China rivalry: What role does the East Asia Summit play?

机译:日中竞争:东亚峰会发挥什么作用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although economically interdependent, political rivalry between Japan and China have brought about the inability of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Plus Three (APT) process to transform itself into an East Asia Summit (EAS) as originally envisioned. The existence of the APT and the EAS as two separate entities not only reflected the politico-security rivalry between the two neighbours but more importantly affected the direction and progress of East Asian regionalism as a whole. Aiming to provide a historical account of the EAS process and examine Japan's role in the development of the EAS framework, this paper argues that Japan has put greater attention on the EAS and made numerous unilateral initiatives to develop it. While Japan does not seek ultimate power, it considers the EAS as an excellent opportunity to: (i) raise its influence in the region vis-à-vis China; (ii) elevate the status of the EAS in region-building and (iii) check Chinese advances by fulfilling its long-held policy of having other Asia Pacific countries, primarily Australia and New Zealand, join. Nevertheless, the decision to expand the EAS to include the USA and Russia will have some adverse effects on Japan's unilateral ambitions and the furtherance of regionalisation processes.
机译:尽管经济上相互依存,但中日之间的政治竞争导致东南亚国家联盟加三国(APT)进程无法按照最初的设想将自己转变为东亚峰会(EAS)。 APT和EAS作为两个独立实体的存在,不仅反映了两个邻国之间的政治安全竞争,而且更重要地影响了整个东亚地区主义的方向和进步。为了提供对EAS进程的历史解释并检验日本在EAS框架发展中的作用,本文认为日本对EAS给予了更多关注,并为发展该框架做出了许多单方面倡议。尽管日本没有寻求最终的权力,但日本将东亚和太平洋地区看作是一个极好的机会:(i)相对于中国增强其在该地区的影响力; (ii)提升EAS在地区建设中的地位,并(iii)履行其长期以来让其他亚太国家(主要是澳大利亚和新西兰)加入的政策,以检查中国的进步。尽管如此,将EAS扩展到美国和俄罗斯的决定将对日本的单方面野心和区域化进程的推进产生不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号