...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>ABA banking journal >Of Chickens, Debt Collection and Standing: Supreme Court Preview
【24h】

Of Chickens, Debt Collection and Standing: Supreme Court Preview

机译：鸡，债务追回和诉讼地位：最高法院预览

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Obduskey will address whether the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act applies to nonjudicial mortgage foreclosures. In 2009, a Colorado homeowner defaulted on his Wells Fargo mortgage. Wells initiated nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings and spent six years attempting to foreclose on the property. During the foreclosure process, the homeowner cried "fowl," alleging that Wells Fargo violated the FDCPA's debt validations procedures and sued Wells Fargo in Colorado federal district court. Both the district court and the Tenth Circuit held the FDCPA does not apply to nonjudicial foreclosures. However, the Tenth Circuit's holding conflicts with the Third, Fourth and Sixth Circuits, as well as the state supreme courts of Alaska and Colorado. Given the changing composition of the Supreme Court—including a new justice—it is difficult to gauge how it will come down on this issue.
机译：奥博杜斯基（Obduskey）将探讨《公平债务催收实务法》是否适用于非司法抵押丧失抵押品赎回权。 2009年，科罗拉多州的一位房主拖欠了其在富国银行的抵押贷款。威尔斯启动了非司法丧失抵押品赎回权的程序，并花了六年时间试图对该财产进行赎回。在取消抵押品赎回权的过程中，房主大喊“家禽”，称富国银行违反了FDCPA的债务确认程序，并在科罗拉多州联邦地方法院起诉了富国银行。无论是地方法院还是第十届巡回法院都持有FDCPA，这不适用于非司法丧失抵押品赎回权的案件。但是，第十巡回法院的举行与第三，第四和第六巡回法院以及阿拉斯加和科罗拉多州的州最高法院发生冲突。鉴于最高法院组成的变化（包括新的大法官），很难确定在这个问题上将如何归结。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号