• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of International Affairs >Gendered political economy and the politics of migrant worker rights: the view from South-East Asia
【24h】

Gendered political economy and the politics of migrant worker rights: the view from South-East Asia

机译：性别政治经济学与农民工权利政治：东南亚的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Focusing on the South-East Asian region and looking specifically at activism around the position of migrant domestic workers in the region, this article seeks to evaluate why migrant activist organisations appear to have had, at best, modest influence on gendering the International Labour Organization's approach to labour rights. The author argues that this is largely due to how dominant understandings of labour rights have neglected the significance of social relations of reproduction (i.e. those ‘care-related’ activities associated with the household) to the functioning of the labour market. Furthermore, a transnationalisation of social relations of reproduction is manifested in the increased feminisation of labour migration in the region and this highlights further problems with dominant labour rights perspectives that remain largely state-centric in their approach. The significance of South-East Asian states in promoting localised regimes of citizenship/immigration and industrial relations greatly limits the ability of activist groups to claim and utilise the language of human rights. Nonetheless, the article argues that a concern with the human rights of female migrants can potentially destabilise dominant understandings of labour and human rights. More generally, the article seeks to demonstrate the insights that a critical feminist human rights approach can bring to studies of work and employment within international political economy. View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357710903460022
机译：本文着眼于东南亚地区，并特别关注围绕移民家庭工人在该地区的地位的激进主义，本文旨在评估为什么移民激进组织似乎充其量只是对国际劳工组织的性别观点产生了适度的影响劳工权利。作者认为，这主要是由于对劳工权利的主流理解如何忽视了再生产的社会关系（即那些与家庭有关的“与护理有关”的活动）对劳动力市场运作的重要性。此外，再生产社会关系的跨国化表现为该地区劳务移民女性化程度的提高，这突出了主要的劳工权利观点在其方法中仍主要以国家为中心的进一步问题。东南亚国家在促进本地化的公民身份，移民和劳资关系方面的重要意义极大地限制了维权团体主张和利用人权语言的能力。尽管如此，该文章认为，对女性移民人权的关注可能会破坏对劳动和人权的主流理解。更笼统地说，本文试图证明一种批判的女权主义人权方法可以为国际政治经济学中的工作和就业研究带来的见解。查看全文下载全文相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布时间：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b “};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357710903460022

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号