• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of maritime & ocean affairs >A legal assessment of China's historic claims in the South China Sea
【24h】

A legal assessment of China's historic claims in the South China Sea

机译：对中国在南中国海的历史主张的法律评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article aims to understand China's historic claim, the purpose and status of the nine-dashed line map and analyses the legal implications of China's historic claim over the islands and maritime areas of the South China Sea. From the various, albeit ambiguous, claims that refer to the element of 'history' as the basis for supporting China's claims, it can be surmised that China's historic claims comprise two broad aspects: a 'historic basis of sovereignty' claim over islands in the South China Sea, and a 'historic claim over maritime areas/activities' in South China Sea. The article concludes that in order to assess China's claims in the South China Sea, these claims will have to be examined independently of the nine-dashed line map as the map has little or no legal value for China to establish its various claims. Further, China's historic claim over maritime areas (water column, seabed and subsoil, low tide elevations and submerged features) cannot supersede other coastal states' well established rights over their exclusive economic zones and continental shelf.
机译：本文旨在了解中国的历史主张，九点划线地图的目的和地位，并分析中国历史主张对南中国海岛屿和海域的法律影响。从各种指称“历史”作为支持中国主张基础的主张中，尽管模棱两可，但可以推测，中国的历史主张包括两个广泛方面：对岛屿上主权的“历史基础”。南中国海，以及南中国海的“有关海域/活动的历史性主张”。文章的结论是，为了评估中国在南中国海的主张，这些主张必须独立于九点划线图进行审查，因为该图对于中国确立其各种主张几乎没有法律价值。此外，中国对海域（水柱，海床和底土，低潮高程和淹没特征）的历史性主张不能取代其他沿海国家对其专属经济区和大陆架的完善权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号