...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of water resources >AUTHOR'S REPLY
【24h】

AUTHOR'S REPLY

机译：作者的答复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

I appreciate the interest that R French has shown in my paper and his interesting suggestions regarding the development of regional flood frequency (RFF) procedures; although I feel that his final comments are hardly justified. The four RFF procedures presented in my paper were developed individually over a 12-year period with the objective of developing more accurate procedures than those that I derived (Flavell et al, 1987) for the 1987 version of Australian Rainfall and Runoff (ARR1987) (Pilgrim, 1987). The form and the factors included in the procedures are purely a function of the quality of the available streamflow data. In particular the fact that latitude and longitude are the most significant climate factors found for the Pilbara shows that location is a better indicator of the paths of the cyclones that traverse the Pilbara than the rainfall data given in ARR1987.
机译：我感谢R French在我的论文中表现出的兴趣以及他对发展区域洪水频率（RFF）程序的有趣建议；尽管我觉得他的最后评论几乎没有道理。我的论文中介绍的四种RFF程序是在12年的时间内分别开发的，目的是开发比我针对1987年版的澳大利亚降雨和径流（ARR1987）（Flavell等，1987）推导的程序更准确的程序（ARR1987）（朝圣者（1987）。过程中包括的形式和因素纯粹是可用流数据质量的函数。特别是，纬度和经度是皮尔巴拉地区最重要的气候因素，这一事实表明，与ARR1987中给出的降雨数据相比，位置是更好的指示气旋路径穿越皮尔巴拉地区的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号