首页> 外文期刊>Australian Library Journal >Textbooks in Academic Libraries: Selection, Circulation and Assessment
【24h】

Textbooks in Academic Libraries: Selection, Circulation and Assessment

机译:高校图书馆教科书:选择,流通与评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Academic librarians tend to be conservative. We cling to comfortable, traditional practices. Historically, academic libraries have not collected textbooks as they have been seen primarily as a student's responsibility to purchase. There are, however, exceptions and they are the focus of Textbooks in Academic Libraries: Selection, Circulation and Assessment. Rising higher education costs means access to education worldwide is becoming less equitable. In particular, textbooks are increasingly unaffordable for many students. Editor Chris Diaz (digital publishing services librarian at Northwestern University) argues convincingly that libraries can help bring down costs for students through textbook reserve programs. He points out such programs also bring wider benefits to the student as well as the institution: providing a print textbook reserve program can improve student recruitment, retention and success.This collection of nine case studies aims to: 'pull together creative approaches and best practices for fomalizing, promoting, and managing print textbook reserve programs'. Although diverse, all are institutions in the United States. However, textbook affordability in higher education is a worldwide concern and certainly pertinent to Australia. All chapters are well written and carefully step the reader through the way each library has approachedthe challenge of rising cost of textbooks by selectively adding them to their collections. Interestingly, many of these programs were funded, at least in part, with partners beyond the library such as student unions or government. Rather surprisingly, given our increasingly digital world, all chapters focus on print collections although a few authors raise the question of e-textbooks, and there are some brief references to the possibilities of Open Educational Resources (OERs).
机译:高校图书馆员倾向于保守。我们坚持舒适的传统做法。从历史上看,大学图书馆没有收集教科书,因为它们主要被视为学生的购买责任。但是,也有例外,它们是大学图书馆教科书的重点:选择,发行和评估。不断上涨的高等教育成本意味着全球范围内获得教育的机会越来越不公平。特别是,对于许多学生而言,课本越来越难以负担。编辑西北大学的数字出版服务图书馆员克里斯·迪亚兹(Chris Diaz)令人信服地指出,图书馆可以通过课本储备计划帮助降低学生的费用。他指出,这样的计划也为学生和学校带来更大的好处:提供印刷版教科书储备计划可以提高学生的招募,保留和成功率。这九个案例研究的目的是:``将创造性的方法和最佳实践结合在一起制定,推广和管理印刷版教科书储备计划”。尽管各不相同,但它们都是美国的机构。但是,高等教育的课本负担能力是全球关注的问题,并且当然与澳大利亚有关。所有章节都写得很好,并仔细地引导读者理解每个图书馆如何通过有选择地将其添加到藏书中来应对教科书成本上涨的挑战。有趣的是,其中许多计划至少部分是由图书馆以外的合作伙伴(如学生会或政府)资助的。令人惊讶的是,鉴于我们的数字世界越来越多,尽管有些作者提出了电子教科书的问题,但所有章节都将重点放在印刷品收藏上,并且简要提及了开放式教育资源(OER)的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号