• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Aviation Fire Journal >LOOKING BACK AT INTERIOR AIRCRAFT FIRES TRANS WORLD AIRLINES LOCKHEED L1011 CRASH & INTERIOR FIRE KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, JULY 30, 1992
【24h】

LOOKING BACK AT INTERIOR AIRCRAFT FIRES TRANS WORLD AIRLINES LOCKHEED L1011 CRASH & INTERIOR FIRE KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, JULY 30, 1992

机译：1992年7月30日，肯尼迪国际机场，内陆飞机着火事故穿越世界航空公司洛克希德L1011坠毁和内部火警

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This is the twenty-forth of arnseries of articles that will reviewrnhistorical ARFF responses withrnsignificant lessons to learn. Wernwill try to read between the linesrnof accident reports, magazinernarticles, conference presentations,rnpictures, and other informationrnsources to attempt to determinernwhat problems the emergencyrnresponders encountered,rnas well as their resulting size-up,rnaction plan, and end results. Wernwill try to learn from the past, inrnorder to be able to perform betterrnin the future. The accidents thatrnwill be reviewed in this series ofrnarticles can easily happen again.rnOur newer, younger generationrnof ARFF professionals may notrneven be aware of these emergencyrnscenarios. The AircraftrnRescue and Fire Fighting professionrnneeds to analyze every accidentrnpossible to learn what canrnbe done to plan and prepare forrnsimilar incidents in the future.rnWe need to learn from our experiences.rnUnfortunately, thisrndoes not happen as well as itrnshould or could. Although therernis plenty of information regardingrnthe facts and probable cause ofrnan aircraft accident, there is oftenrnvery little information availablernabout the emergency response.rnUntil we start doing this,rnwe may miss opportunities tornimprove, or worse, be doomed tornmake the same mistakes. Thernintent of this article is not to belittle,rnoffend, or anger the emergencyrnpersonnel or organizationsrnthat responded to this accident.rnThey worked hard and did the best they could with their training,rnequipment, and experience.rnYou cannot ask more than that, butrnhow much training or operationalrnguidelines did they have to preparernthem for this type of emergencyrnscenario? They most likely hadrnzero experience. Like they say,rnhindsight is 20/20. It is muchrneasier to pose questions orrnsuggest alternative proceduresrnafter a response, than it is to makernthose split second tactical decisionsrnwhen arriving and working atrnthe actual accident scene. Thernfirefighters that responded to thisrnincident might perform differentlyrnor better, if they had a secondrnchance to do it over again.
机译：这是一系列文章的二十四篇，将回顾历史性的ARFF响应以及重要的经验教训。 Wernwill会尝试在事故报告，杂志文章，会议演讲，图片和其他信息来源之间进行阅读，以试图确定紧急响应者遇到的问题，风险及其最终的规模，行动计划和最终结果。 Wernwill会尝试从过去的经验中学习，以便能够在未来表现更好。在本系列文章中将要回顾的事故很容易再次发生。我们的新一代，更年轻的ARFF专业人士可能甚至都没有意识到这些紧急情况。飞机救援和消防专业需要分析每一个可能的事故，以了解将来可以做些什么来计划和准备类似的事故。尽管有大量有关飞机失事的事实和可能原因的信息，但关于应急响应的信息往往很少。本文的目的不是贬低，冒犯或激怒应对这一事故的紧急人员或组织。他们努力工作，并在培训，设备和经验方面尽了最大的努力。或操作指南，他们是否必须为此类紧急情况做准备？他们最有可能拥有零经验。就像他们说的那样，事后监督是20/20。在响应后提出问题或提出最建议的替代程序要比在到达并在实际事故现场工作时做出一秒钟的第二战术决策要好得多。响应这一事件的消防员的表现可能会有所不同，甚至更好，如果他们有再紧要的机会。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Aviation Fire Journal》 |2016年第5期|5-11|共7页
  • 作者

    Les Omans;

  • 作者单位

    San Jose Fire Department (California, USA);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号