...
【24h】

Reviews

机译:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The warthog and the Close Air Support Debate (Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, 2003, $34.95) should be required reading for every student of military history for three reasons. The first two reasons are alluded to in the tide, for author Douglas E. Campbell, a fan of the fabulous Fairchild A-10, provides a balanced portrait of the advantages (many) and disadvantages (relatively few) of the Warthog as he outlines the debate over close air support that has raged since World War Ⅱ. The third reason is perhaps the most important, for The Warthog and the Close Air Support Debate also gives an extremely accurate insider's view of the way the Pentagon operates, with all its faults (many) and all its virtues (relatively few). Campbell's analysis of the way the Pentagon's advocacy system works illustrates the many constituencies that operate in the five-sided building, each with its own agenda, operating methods and interests. The author seems to describe this almost inadvertently as he details the background of the close air support debate and the emergence of the A-10 as an initially unwanted child of the U.S. Air Force.
机译:出于以下三个原因,每位具有军事历史的学生都需要阅读《疣猪》和《近距离空中支援辩论》(海军学院出版社,安纳波利斯,2003年,34.95美元)。潮汐中提到了前两个原因,因为神话般的Fairchild A-10的作者道格拉斯·坎贝尔(Douglas E. Campbell)概述了疣猪所概述的优点(很多)和缺点(相对很少)自第二次世界大战以来,有关近距离空中支援的争论一直在进行。第三个原因也许是最重要的,因为《疣猪战役》和《近距离空中支援辩论》还给出了五角大楼行动方式的极为准确的内部人士观点,其中有很多缺点(很多)和所有优点(相对很少)。坎贝尔对五角大楼倡导系统运作方式的分析说明了五面大楼中运作的许多选区,每个选区都有自己的议程,运作方法和兴趣。作者似乎在不经意间描述了这一点,因为他详细介绍了近距离空中支援辩论的背景以及A-10作为美国空军最初不受欢迎的孩子而出现的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号