...
首页> 外文期刊>Aviation maintenance >IN-HOUSE DOMS VS. THIRD PARTY TOTAL CARE PROVIDERS
【24h】

IN-HOUSE DOMS VS. THIRD PARTY TOTAL CARE PROVIDERS

机译:内部圆顶与VS。第三方总照顾者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It's no news to anyone reading this that the last 10 or so years have not been kind to business aviation. The reasons? Well, that depends on whom you ask. But, the bottom line is that even steadfast B&GA aircraft owner/operators have had to look for ways to cut costs and "streamline" their operations. And while I don't have any facts to prove it, from talking to so many people in the industry I'd say one of the hardest hit groups have been the in-house directors of maintenance. (Funny or sad, it seems that when aircraft owners try to save money one of the first things they cut are the folks that are responsible for the safe operation of a valuable asset.) Of course, even the most dollar-conscious owner/operators can't leave their aircraft with no maintenance support. Their decision to cut DOM overhead is often directly related to the availability of a variety of "contracted" maintenance providers. "Why pay someone on staff to do something I can get a contractor to do for less...?"
机译:对于任何阅读此书的人来说,过去十年左右对公务航空都不是好消息。原因?好吧,这取决于您问谁。但是,最重要的是,即使是坚定的B&GA飞机所有者/运营商也不得不寻找削减成本和“简化”其运营的方法。尽管我没有任何事实可以证明这一点,但从与行业中如此众多的人交谈中,我会说,受打击最严重的团队之一是内部维护主管。 (有趣或难过,似乎当飞机所有者试图省钱时,他们削减的第一件事就是对有价值的资产的安全运行负责的人。)当然,即使是最了解美元的所有者/运营商,不能让他们的飞机没有维护支持。他们削减DOM开销的决定通常直接与各种“合同”维护提供商的可用性有关。 “为什么要付钱给员工做某事,而我却可以让承包商以更少的钱做……?”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Aviation maintenance》 |2015年第8期|30-34|共5页
  • 作者

    Dale Smith;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号