...
【24h】

Misguided Debate

机译:误导辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Critics of counterinsurgency say it represents the triumph of tactics over strategy. Looking at the Air Force's mooted OA-X and A-X2 procurement programs, and the A-10 retirement debate, one can see exactly the same issues in play. For close air support (CAS), there is no denying that a dedicated platform such as the A-10 (see photo), or its proposed replacement, the AX-2, is best. Best in battlefield terms, that is. If a ground force is taking heavy fire from an enemy (one that has no air cover and minimal surface-to-air weaponry), you cannot beat a low-and slow-flying aircraft with a heavy ordnance load and a rapid-fire gun. That's a tactic.
机译:反对平叛运动的批评家说,这代表了战术胜于战略。查看空军提出的OA-X和A-X2采购计划,以及A-10退役辩论,就可以看到完全相同的问题。对于近距离空中支援(CAS),不可否认的是,最好使用专用平台(例如A-10)(见图)或建议的替代平台AX-2。那是战场上最好的。如果地面部队从敌人身上猛烈射击(没有防空罩,地对空武器最少),那么您就无法打败重载弹药和速射炮的低速慢速飞机。这是一种策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号