...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Aviation Week & Space Technology >HOLD ON TO SYSTEMS ENGINEERS
【24h】

HOLD ON TO SYSTEMS ENGINEERS

机译：坚持系统工程师

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The recent letter lamenting the loss of engineering subject matter expertise (SME) points out that system engineering isn't a substitute for detailed technical knowledge (AW&ST June 9, p. 10). As a practicing system engineer, I couldn't agree more. Not that long ago, standing armies of disconnected technical experts (bricks), organizationally unable to logically link their contributions in a meaningful way (mortar), gave rise to the need for system engineering. The problem then was that even the best bricks, absent mortar, fell down too often. Today's approach of all mortar and no bricks doesn't seem like such a good idea either. This shouldn't be an "either/or" debate, but rather how best to establish and maintain a healthy balance. Perhaps the problem is that we too often speak of "system engineers" instead of people with genuine system engineering expertise. The difference is enormous.
机译：最近一封感叹工程专业知识（SME）丧失的信件指出，系统工程不能替代详细的技术知识（AW＆ST 6月9日，第10页）。作为一名练习系统工程师，我完全同意。不久前，技术专家（砖头）的脱节常备军在组织上无法以有意义的方式将他们的贡献逻辑地联系起来（凡人），这引起了对系统工程的需求。那时的问题是，即使是最好的砖，没有砂浆，也经常掉落。如今，所有使用灰泥和无砖块的方法似乎也不是一个好主意。这不应该是一场“非此即彼”的辩论，而应是如何最好地建立和维持健康的平衡。也许问题是我们经常说“系统工程师”，而不是真正的系统工程专家。区别是巨大的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号