• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Baltic Journal of Management >Moral judgment: a comparison of Latvian and US business persons
【24h】

Moral judgment: a comparison of Latvian and US business persons

机译：道德判断：拉脱维亚和美国商人的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose – Given system-wide lapses in moral decision making in large US corporations and the inherited corruption from formerly planned economies, the development of moral reasoning is an important issue for business educators in the USA and Latvia. The purpose of this paper is to present a comparison of Latvian and US business persons. Design/methodology/approach – Kohlberg's et al., theory of cognitive moral development (CMD), as operationalized by Rest as framework to study the antecedents of moral judgment in both lands. Survey data from 340 employed MBA students as a proxy for current and future business leaders are used. A total of 18 scenarios are reduced to four unique components, which are regressed on measures of CMD, Country of Respondent, and Moral Philosophy to test three hypotheses. Gender and age are added as controls. Findings – CMD and Country of Respondent are strongly associated with increased moral judgment, while Moral Philosophy is less influential. In addition, the positive functional relationship between CMD and moral judgment exists in both countries but at lesser absolute values in Latvia. Findings also suggest that the efficacy of the independent variables varies with the issues at hand. Interestingly, moral dilemmas concerned with marketing strategies appear to be immune from moral reasoning. This indirectly gives support to Jones' concept of moral intensity and future research may wish to continue this line of inquiry as well as expand the comparison to other European Union countries. Originality/value – The paper is the first to use the defining issues test to study levels of CMD in the Latvian business community.
机译：目的–鉴于美国大型公司的道德决策在整个系统中都存在失误以及​​以前计划经济造成的继承腐败，道德推理的发展对于美国和拉脱维亚的商业教育者来说是一个重要的问题。本文的目的是对拉脱维亚和美国商人进行比较。设计/方法论/方法-科尔伯格等人的认知道德发展理论（CMD），由雷斯特（Rest）运用作为研究两地道德判断前因的框架。使用来自340名MBA学生的调查数据作为当前和未来业务领导者的代理。总共18个场景被简化为四个独特的组成部分，并根据CMD的度量，受访者所在的国家和道德哲学进行了回归，以检验三个假设。性别和年龄被添加为控件。调查结果– CMD和受访者所在国与道德判断力的提高紧密相关，而道德哲学的影响力则较小。此外，这两个国家都存在CMD与道德判断之间的积极功能关系，但在拉脱维亚的绝对价值较低。研究结果还表明，自变量的有效性随即将出现的问题而变化。有趣的是，与营销策略有关的道德困境似乎不受道德推理的影响。这间接地为琼斯的道德强度概念提供了支持，未来的研究可能希望继续进行这一研究，并将其与其他欧盟国家进行比较。原创性/价值–该论文是首次使用定义问题测试来研究拉脱维亚商业社区中CMD的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号