• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers >Timed picture naming: Extended norms and validation against previous studies
【24h】

Timed picture naming: Extended norms and validation against previous studies

机译：定时图片命名：扩展的规范和针对先前研究的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Factors affecting word retrieval were compared in a timed picture-naming paradigm for 520 drawings of objects. In prior timed and untimed studies by Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) and Snodgrass and Yuditsky (1996), concerns were raised that participants could not reliably name large numbers of items in a single session. We show that reliable results are obtained in a single session for 520 items and validate our method against previous findings by Snodgrass and colleagues for overlapping items. For these items, comparable levels of name agreement and latency are obtained, and we replicate effects of length, frequency, both objective and subjective age of acquisition, and visual complexity on reaction time (RT) and name agreement measures. Name agreement is unaffected by order of presentation, although there is a gradual increase in RTs across the session, requiring use of multiple random orders. Current extensions of our method include cross-linguistic, bilingual, developmental, and neuro-psychological studies and comparisons of action naming and object naming.
机译：在520个对象的定时图片命名范例中比较了影响单词检索的因素。在Snodgrass和Vanderwart（1980）以及Snodgrass和Yuditsky（1996）进行的事先定时和不定时的研究中，有人担心参与者无法在一个会话中可靠地命名大量项目。我们展示了在520个项目的单个会话中获得的可靠结果，并针对Snodgrass和同事对重叠项目的先前发现验证了我们的方法。对于这些项目，获得了可比较水平的名称同意和等待时间，并且我们复制了长度，频率，获取的主观和主观年龄以及视觉复杂度对反应时间（RT）和名称同意度量的影响。名称约定不受表示顺序的影响，尽管整个会话期间的RT逐渐增加，需要使用多个随机顺序。我们方法的当前扩展包括跨语言，双语，发展和神经心理学研究，以及动作命名和对象命名的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号