首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral and Brain Sciences >What we need is theory of human cooperation (and meta-analysis) to bridge the gap between the lab and the wild
【24h】

What we need is theory of human cooperation (and meta-analysis) to bridge the gap between the lab and the wild

机译:我们需要的是人类合作理论(和荟萃分析),以弥合实验室与野外之间的鸿沟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This commentary seeks to clarify the potential discrepancy between lab-based and field data in the use and effectiveness of punishment to promote cooperation by recommending theory that outlines key differences between the lab and field, such as the shadow of the future and degree of information availability. We also discuss a recent meta-analysis (Balliet et al. 2011) that does not support all conclusions outlined in Guala's target article.
机译:本评论旨在通过推荐理论来阐明实验室和实地数据在惩罚的使用和有效性方面的潜在差异,以促进合作,该理论概述了实验室和实地之间的关键差异,例如未来的阴影和信息可用性的程度。我们还将讨论最近的荟萃分析(Balliet等,2011),该分析并不支持瓜拉目标文章中概述的所有结论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Behavioral and Brain Sciences》 |2012年第1期|p.41-42|共2页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号